User talk:Masecar90

Speedy deletion nomination of Grant Edmund Cardon


A tag has been placed on Grant Edmund Cardon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dinuraeditions (talk) 10:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Masecar90. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Grant Edmund Cardon, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Grant Edmund Cardon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grant Edmund Cardon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Grant Edmund Cardon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Grant E. Cardon wiki page
how is a distinguished professor with over 40 publications in scientific journals and texts not meet criteria to be a "notable person"? Masecar90 (talk) 22:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see Notability (people) and WP:SCHOLAR. Notability requires evidence, generally in the form of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. "Distinguished" is an opinion unless attributable to reliable sources. Feel free to comment in the deletion discussion (where consensus will ultimately be reached), and/or include sources demonstrating notability. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)