User talk:Masgouf

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Flags of the Ottoman Empire into Red flag (politics). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! SharabSalam (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

U.S. Central Command
We do not use "Controversy" sections in articles; it's a bit too hard to judge what *everyone* will consider controversial, and creates problems about WP:POV - whose POV.. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Hi welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am not biased and I don't want to revert your contributions. I am just trying to help you. Many of the additions that you added are not sourced this text for example is not sourced could you add a source for it? . Finally I am always here if you need any help please don't hesitate and ask me in my talk page user talk:SharabSalam. Also don't forget to write edit summaries because they are helpful for you and other editors who want to know what are the changes that you have done to the article. Again thank you for your contributions.--SharabSalam (talk) 17:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your addition to Leclerc tank has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

DRN notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for Dispute resolution noticeboard. Please review the request at Dispute resolution noticeboard and enter your statement here. Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)