User talk:Masonstaggs

January 2017
Hello, I'm WNYY98. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thomas O. Staggs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WNYY98 (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geronimo Allison. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WNYY98 (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Masonstaggs


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Masonstaggs, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 22:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)