User talk:Masschaos777

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pulp fiction has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 05:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Pulp fiction. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 05:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Please read the page Pulp fiction. The movie's page is at Pulp Fiction (film). — Jeff G. ツ 05:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Neutralitytalk 22:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Pepe the Frog. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 00:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Pepe the Frog regarding its use by the alt-right. clpo13(talk) 00:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
If you continue to insert unsourced content, deleted referenced content, and engage in tendentious editing, you are very likely to be blocked. Neutralitytalk 02:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pepe the Frog, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Dakota Access Pipeline protests
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dakota Access Pipeline protests, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! XyzSpaniel Talk Page  22:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)