User talk:Masse Futurist

Edits without edit summaries tend to look like vandalism or spam!
I have noticed you commonly don't enter an edit summary. This causes me problems. When I patrol for vandalism, I use the summary to make a preliminary decision on whether or not the post is a vandal edit or not. If the summary is present (or at least a section header, the part inside the /* */), I commonly decide the edit is legit and move on.

However, if no edit summary is available, I typically resort to loading the diff for the edit. This takes time. For that reason, if your edits are all valid, I ask that you provide edit summaries. For more on how to enter an edit summary, please read Help:Edit summary.

Incidentally, it is not just me that appreciate having edit summaries. When you omit your summary, you may be telling various bots that you are vandalizing pages. For this reason, please consider providing that summary. It is very important.

The edit summary appears in black italics in the following places:
 * Page history - list of changes to the page you edited
 * User contributions - list of all your edits
 * Watchlist *  - list of recent changes to watched pages (logged-in users only)
 * diff page - shows the difference between two edits
 * Recent changes - list of all recent edits
 * Wikipedia IRC channels - real time list of all edits
 * Related changes - list of recent changes to pages linked to the page you edited
 * List of new pages: shows the edit summary of the creation.

 *  Use the enhanced watchlist to see all recent changes in the watched pages, not just the last change in each page. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mankind in Transition


The article Mankind in Transition has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBOOK and the GNG. I searched for sources in a variety of databases (ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Newspapers.com, Google Books/Scholar/News, etc.) but found no significant coverage of this book in independent reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:59, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Automated Society


The article The Automated Society has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBOOK and the GNG. I searched for sources in a variety of databases (ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Newspapers.com, Google Books/Scholar/News, etc.) and found only a single short review. Lacks the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources needed to clear the notability threshold."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)