User talk:Massgrownpro

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skyword has been accepted
 Skyword, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Rahat (Message) 15:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Massgrownpro help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Skyword for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyword is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Skyword (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

your edit on Vieques
thanks for your edits. please use author and date of publication, when referencing- or insert archived links if you dont.--Wuerzele (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

another thing: if you use the same ref twice, please name it, to reuse it. So I named your ref, with fsmp15 as short and easy as possible for me to type, and with clues for me to remember as i write that it's the Final Site Management Plan Fiscal Year 2015. the second time you use the source, you use it like this:. the forward slash denotes the end of the ref.

lastly, if you cite a source that's more than say 2 or 3 pages long, you should really indicate the page of your claim by adding the page or page range with this bracket to the ref. this is obviously important with books, but sadly not everybody does it. Okay? --Wuerzele (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry for all the problems. Can you point me to an article that explains the policies and standards that you describe. Hope that the contribution was helpful in some way. The article looked like it needed some more contributions, and there were even problems like incomplete sentences. Massgrownpro (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Massgrownpro

Nomination of Skyword for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyword is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Skyword& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 01:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)