User talk:Massimilianogalardi

Nomination of Mercatale di Vernio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mercatale di Vernio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mercatale di Vernio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBaK (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Mercatale di vernio is a village that create the municipality of vernio instead of San Quirico and Sant'Ippolito.The Village of Vernio don't exist.There are 3 village that(united) make the Vernio commune --Massimilianogalardi (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Massimilianogalardi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! jonkerz ♠talk 14:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

The article Anna Patrociello has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Patrociello


A tag has been placed on Anna Patrociello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shriram (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Patrociello


A tag has been placed on Anna Patrociello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shriram (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bir-Lehlu


A tag has been placed on Bir-Lehlu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reichsfurst (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Bir-Lehlu
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Bir-Lehlu. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Giorgio Panariello, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matilda, Rai and Hands on (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hello! Thank you for your work on adding new Italian village articles. I've added to a couple of them, Cavarzano and Celle de Vernio. Keep up the good work, and let me know on my talk page if there is anything I can help you with. :) --Cerebellum (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Warning and explaination
Hello, I'm DerBorg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Thanks for your contributions but you are cordially invited to note something: Please avoid to add personal reflections, 1st person talking reffered to you (this is an encyclopedia), POV, too long galleries (Wikipedia is not Commons), too great and super-detailed linked lists about everything in each commune of the Province of Prato. Remember spacing after dots and commas, check the grammar, categorization, markup etc. Thanks for attention and regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Other problems are about the correct usage of letter cases (upper and lower), related to proper nouns (eg.: Prato is ok, prato isn't), categorization, very long texts without any reference or source, usage of section titles (there is also the markup for subsections), ording sections etc etc. I suggest you to read the manual of style before adding anything, because each article you edited, sincerely needs formatting and to be wikified and referenced. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Checking your contributions, I've found several serious problems. I'm very sorry for this warning because I've still noted you on Commons for the great number of pictures you donated to that project. It's a great work, but... But I've noted you there also for the grammar problems creating categories, pages, (not) using spaces, adding descriptions, using personal categories. The same kind of problems found here at enwiki. Resuming:


 * 1) You can't talk in first (or second) person on an article as you did here (if like me you missed it, the church tower will offer). Or as you did on commons about a category of images in my house (my of who?). Bisenzio is a river, not "our" river.
 * 2) Personal reflections are out of project scope, in all Wikimedia projects. Lots of text are personal reflections.
 * 3) English grammar: I'm sorry, but the text is suddenly difficult to understand. Some sentences are single words and some phrases looks like not finished. I've also found some text using italian words mixed to English ones (then too far from our intent, abbandoniamole here).
 * 4) Manual of style: After a comma or a dot a space is needed. You also need to take care of letter cases for proper nouns and toponyms (Vaiano, not vaiano). Some section are redundant and some other are composed by single words or telegraph sentences. Another problem are that infinite lists of, at almost, "red links". Another problem is about apostrophes instead of accents (La Pietà, not La Pieta').

I don't understand how is that possible. On Commons you were warned on talk several times, and several times blocked, before the indef one (in one of them i read ... Creating out of scope categories, working carelessness in spite of warnings.). I've seen that also on it.wiki you have been indef blocked.

English Wikipedia is another project, of course. But checking your contribs here, I've seen that the conduct is the same of Commons and, for what I'm reading, of Italian WP (and this contrib is pure vandalism). Usage of an encyclopedia for personal reflections and POV, 1st person talking about personal experiences or other is good on Facebook. Also with the amount of the problems I've explained above, this is considered vandalism. Also because this are typical mistakes of new users, anon IPs and occasional contributors. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)