User talk:MassiveLizard

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MassiveLizard. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 13:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Irrationalism
Hello MassiveLizard,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Irrationalism for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nicky mathew (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

A page on Nietzschen concept of the attemptist
This needs to be done MassiveLizard (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Austin Insided


A tag has been placed on Austin Insided requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Finngall  talk  03:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Attemptist


A tag has been placed on Attemptist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Finngall  talk  03:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Austin Insided. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  03:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Austin Insided, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  03:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

The article of confederation of wikipedia
Yes, they have rules, but something more is in order; namely, gradation of rank. For obvious reasons, this will keep good taste and ensure the commonwealth of intellectuals; and their authority, not public opinion MassiveLizard (talk) 04:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * What. Clubjustin (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleted articles
It seems that you have invented the term "attemptist" yourself, based on a line in Nietzsche. Original research and synthesis is outside the scope of Wikipedia; this means that Wikipedia will not have an article about the term, unless it has been covered by reliable third-party sources. (Plus, the article reads more like vague praise than like an objective definition of a philosophical school - and, conveniently, it lists yourself as an "attemptist".)

I have deleted both the article attemptist and its duplicate list of attemptist, and the second article which you have created about yourself - Austin Insided. Wikipedia cannot be used as a personal website, or as a vehicle for self-promotion. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Mike Rosoft with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other contributors, as you did on this edit to User talk:Mike Rosoft. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Mike Rosoft.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. bonadea contributions talk 11:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

My response
As far as I am concerned, the issue of the article attemptist and related pages is closed. I have already told you what was wrong with them: they constituted blatant original research/synthesis based on a line in Nietzsche (and I am being generous). If you still disagree with the deletion, I have already directed you to deletion review. (But note that Wikipedia will not let you have your article in spite of some of its core policies - or even change these policies - just because you don't like them.)

I assure you, I didn't delete the articles solely because I disagree with your philosophy. Rather, I deleted them because they were way outside the scope of Wikipedia. There are some classes of articles that can be summarily deleted by any administrator upon discovery; these are defined by the speedy deletion criteria. In your case, I was acting under the criterion A7 - article about a living person containing no claim of importance or significance, and criterion A11 - article about an idea (philosophical system) which you have invented, containing no claim of the same. The articles could also fall under the criterion G11 - blatant promotional (in particular, they were apparently created to promote or publicize yourself and your philosophy).

As for your "offenses", they are barely worth my attention. They all constitute vague insinuation about my character, my philosophical and political beliefs. Most of them wouldn't constitute a violation of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, even if they were true. (Calling "he is trained in any particular field" an offense - seriously?) As for your demand that I be stripped of my administrator rank, and you be granted the power to do that yourself (apparently for the sole reason that you don't like me and disagree with the actions I have taken) - I am sure that this is what's going to happen. [sarcasm]

Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. You were given a final warning not to threaten or harass Mike Rosoft and keep the discussion on my talk page. You have ignored my advice, my warnings, and my recommendations. Enough is enough.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

I have an ani notice
This needs to be discussed and it could be confusing separating my old and.New self, but I tell you?.no one has given clear forewarning and I'm going to tweet about this breech of freedom, unless someone explains to me what.is happening? MassiveLizard (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm not angry at deleted articles
Mike Rosoft should of deleted those articles of mine to.me.the were.practise MassiveLizard (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for you do not have the skills or temperament to contribute here productively; issuing threats of off-wiki harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC) MassiveLizard, I have blocked your account after reviewing your contribution history and your deleted articles. I don't see any productive edits to our articles, only self-promotion and attempts to introduce your own coined term into the encyclopedia. In my opinion you do not have the skills or temperament to contribute here productively. Your issuing threats of off-wiki harassment is another reason for your block. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)