User talk:Masso65

December 2016
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jorge Paixão without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jorge Paixão, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jorge Paixão, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello I already send you 2 emails with the following information: On 16th January Hello, I have edited some parts of the wikipedia page of Jorge Paixao because they seem to me depreciative and not informative. Some phrases can hurt me at a professional level such as: - "In the next ten years he has never coached in higher than the third level". - "... leading S.C. Braga to the ninth position - the club's worst finish in 11 years - after only winning two of his ten league games". - "Braga announced that Passion's contract would not be renewed". Please, I would like these phrases to be removed because it seems that the text focuses on negative things and there are many more positive things that are not even in the text. Thank you very much and see you soon.

On the 18th January Hi, good afternoon, I still do not know if you've seen my email, but I still receive negative feedback from some football agents. As I said earlier some wikipedia phrases hurt me professionally. We can continue to talk to improve my page however I will go now to just delete the parts that hurt me. I hope you understand the damage I am suffering and help me in improving the page. thank you so much.

Hope you can help me Best regards Jorge paixão
 * All of the content you removed is factual, referenced and noteworthy. I'm afraid your argument that it is somehow harming your career doesn't carry any wright.  Please refer to WP:COI. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, as we know we coaches also live from public opinion. What is written and managed by you seems to me a little negative in some points. If it was not written by you then whoever did it wanted to harm me and this should not be accepted by who manages the page. I say this because: - there is no reference to two historical clubs that I trained and is an important thing; -there is no reference to the recovery made in Farense, I entered in the 7th game (team with 3 points), last place in 22 teams and I was hired by Braga in the 31st match with the team in 10th place with 42 points. It was through this recovery that I went to s.c.braga; -citation [2] regarding my trip to braga is outdated, citation [3] is wrong. For me it is also strange that the Portuguese page has no negative references and the English has, also strange that in the research I have done on other Portuguese coaches there is no tendency to put the news in a negative way. The fact that i won a supercup in poland is only referenced in the Honors and not in the managerial career. But my biggest concern is in the phrase "- the club's worst finish in 11 years - after only winning two of his ten league games [3] [4]," Nothing informative, just objective to denigrate my image. I hope we can reach a consensus.
 * I did not write any of the content on the page, and I do not think the editors who have had the intention to harm your reputation. Wikipedia is supposed to objectively reflect the notable aspect of an individual's career, whether they be good or bad for that individual.  I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football for this to be discussed at a larger forum. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)