User talk:Master106/Archive 1

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Your recent editing history at Stop the Steal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

I only reverted it once.
 * You've engaged in a slow burning edit war over the last 48 hours. Edit warring isn't strictly limited to 24 hours, so I suggest you stop changing false to substantiated until you reach a consensus on the talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

So changing it to that word twice is considered edit warring?

The talk page did nothing.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

''Please stop adding the timeline to the Sonic article. It's unnecessary. He's the title character. It's to be assumed he's in virtually every main title. Sergecross73  msg me  12:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC) ''


 * Then why does many other series have a timeline? Look at the Super Mario series page for example. Master106 (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, we settle disputes on article talk pages, and only go through with changes if there is WP:CONSENSUS to do so. Just reverting over and over again will just get your account. So I'd start with that if you want to move forward. Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me  21:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)