User talk:MasterAlienhead

June 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Take-Two Interactive ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. O1lI0 (talk) 07:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Take-Two Interactive, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC) this is not vandalism if it is true. this is a public information system and this is public information on the events.

And it is to late. The message is out. do your worst.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Take-Two Interactive ‎. O1lI0 (talk) 07:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Take-Two Interactive. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Murph 9000 (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)