User talk:MasterJ69

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reeks District has been accepted
 Reeks District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Reeks_District help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Reeks District
Hello. And welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that approaching 100% of your edits (to date) on Wikipedia relate to the same subject/title. You may please therefore want to note that, while editing for limited/narrow purposes in itself is not necessarily a concern, it could be worth familiarising yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines about conflicts of interest, advocacy and promotion. Given that recent edits have sought to add and re-add the same unsupported text to the same article, you may also want to take a quick look at the guidelines on ensuring text is verifiable and sources are reliable. Please also take a look at the guidelines for external links. These guidelines confirm that "external links normally should not be placed in the body of an article" (and certainly not in the lead). And links of that type could be considered "spam". Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Guliolopez. Apologies. I am new to this. I will have a detailed read but this is but an innocent attempt to ensure our region is properly referenced on Wikipedia. I'll revert back when I've had a chance to acquaint myself properly. Much appreciated. --MasterJ69 (talk) 12:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi.
 * In terms of the content, I have added a note (with appropriate reference) to the Killorglin article.
 * In terms of the guidelines, and in all honesty, your use of the term "our" and suggestion that "our X needs to be properly covered on Wikipedia" does little to address the concern that your edits seek to advance the goals of something/someone outside Wikipedia. Rather than to advance the goals of this project.
 * Bye. Guliolopez (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)