User talk:MasterPlaster.

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/IconoplastDesignsInc. for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 18:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

{{unblock|is the 12-hour block up yet? I will repost the Iconoplast Desgins page, without "spamming" this time, because it's an important piece of information, and I resolve to make useful contributions and to avoid conflicts of interest{{unblock reviewed|1=is the 12-hour block up yet? I will repost the Iconoplast Desgins page, without "spamming" this time, because it's an important piece of information, and I resolve to make useful contributions and to avoid conflicts of interest.|decline=User's stated intention to repost the page indicates user does not understand block rationale. OhNo itsJamie {{sup|Talk}} 21:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)}}
 * You will not be unblocked if you intend to repost the article. Please familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest guidelines; we are not allowed to put up articles about subjects with which we are closely involved. --jpgordon{{sup| &#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; }} 16:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I also think the user needs to promise to stick with one account and also not insert the link to Iconoplast's website into many articles, which is also spam. {{sub|TravellingCari}}{{sup|the Busy Bee}} 17:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You should also bear in mind that if necessary, URLs persistently inserted may be blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites. WilliamH (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1= I understand the block rationale, but I still think that the work done on these theatres should be historically noted. On the One King West page, the architects are noted, I though it would be fine to note other contributors. I don't think it necessary to delete the entire page. As for the usernames, I promise not to sign in again with another username. Please reconsider putting the page back up. I will not spam it in other websites, nor will I edit it with the intention of promoting this company.|decline=moot Block has already expired— Selket {{sup|Talk}} 17:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)}}

You have been {{#ifeq:|yes|blocked indefinitely|{{#if:48 hours|blocked for a period of 48 hours|temporarily blocked}}}} from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. {{#if:true|{{sub|TravellingCari}}{{sup|the Busy Bee}} 19:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)}} {{#ifeq:|yes|}}

Note: this was just one in the series of inappropriate edits/spam. Have seen no indication user has learned from previous block. {{sub|TravellingCari}}{{sup|the Busy Bee}} 20:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case closed
Please respect the warning in my concluding comment at Suspected sock puppets/IconoplastDesignsInc.. If you resume editing, I strongly recommend that you avoid anything to do with your company or its business, and edit in a completely unrelated topic. Yechiel (Shalom) 03:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)