User talk:Masteranon

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rehman Malik, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rehman Malik was changed by Masteranon (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-12-14T20:52:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Rehman Malik has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Shirik (talk) 20:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

PROD contested at Rehman Malik
Hi there. I have removed the proposal for deletion you placed on Rehman Malik because I contest the deletion. The article has sources which justify the content. Also, please note that Wikipedia is not censored against content that may be considered offensive. Because the material is appropriately and reliably cited, the material is appropriate for this article. If you wish to still argue for the article's deletion, please propose deletion at articles for deletion. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Regards. --Shirik (talk) 21:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Rehman Malik
Both the proposed deletion and the speedy deletion of this article have been declined. If you re-add either tag again I will consider it disruption and will have no qualms about blocking you from editing. If you have a policy based reason that this article should be deleted then the appropriate route for you is to nominate it at articles for deletion. Regards, Nancy  talk  16:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for continued disruption at Rehman Malik despite clear warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nancy talk  16:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)