User talk:Masterclass2020

Welcome!
Hi Masterclass2020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Sorry, I had to revert you again. Please take a class in Wikipedia editing, above. First rule: you can't just add your opinion, or somebody else's opinion, without a reference to a reliable source. Second rule: whenever you are reverted, discuss the matter. I'm ready to explain more if you want it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Masterclass2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Gösta Winbergh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Barkeep49 (talk) 13:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Gösta Winbergh
Hello, Masterclass2020. I have also reverted your edits on this article and fully support Gerda Arendt's comments above. Wikipedia is not the place to post your personal opinions. All additions to articles must be referenced to independent, published sources and must adhere strictly to neutral point of view. Neutral point of view is one of the 5 Pillars of Wikipedia and is non-negotiable. Voceditenore (talk) 13:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Gösta Winbergh. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

You have now been reverted by two experienced editors and you will be blocked if you revert again. Please, take the issue to the article's talk page for discussion and before that, please read Wikipedia's guidelines on neutral point of view and verifiability, both of which you are repeatedly violating. Voceditenore (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)