User talk:Mastermaq

Replaceable fair use File:Dawndumont.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dawndumont.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Dawndumont.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dawndumont.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Geo Swan (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I changed the speedy deletion to a full deletion not because I want to see this fine image deleted, but because I wanted to challenge the speedy. I am sure that you can contact Ms Dumont and have her confirm that this image is being used with her permission through the Wikimedia Foundation's "one ticket system". There is a small committee of experienced people we trust to be discrete. They conduct all correspondence with outsiders where a real world identity needs to be confirmed. So Ms Dumont confirms who she is, and she picks a liscense, like one of the creative commons liscenses.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)