User talk:Masterpiece2000/Archive 4

Professor Sir Michael Rutter2
Dear User:Masterpiece2000,

I am sorry to say that I do not see Richard Dawkins as an accepted authority for this edit.

Can you cite your authority please?

kipKingsleyMiller (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * KingsleyMiller, we don't put "Professor" in the title. You can see the biographies of John Bowlby, Simon Baron-Cohen, etc. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Professor Sir Michael Rutter3
Hello KingsleyMiller. How are you? We don't put "Professor" in the title. You can see other similar biographies. For example, see the biography of Simon Baron-Cohen. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Dear Masterpiece2000,

I am not quite sure what you are saying. The dispute was over the inclusion in the text. You have removed the word from the main body of the text.

Who is 'we'?

KingsleyMiller (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * 'We' means Wikipedians. Please look at other similar biograpies. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I became confused. I am not an expert on Michael Rutter. You should have included this website in the article. That would have helped other users. It's a website of KCL and it calls him "Professor Sir Michael Rutter". I have made necessary changes. You can see the biography. I hope everything is alright. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Years
Thanks M2000, you too. I'll try to correct that linking Years, sorry. Regards. AC+79 3888 (talk) 08:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Richard Dawkins page protection
Yes, I agree, we should apply for it, and I think that we will get it too. It is extremely annoying to see it happen all the time especially when we are trying to get it to FA status. Regards.--AC+79 3888 (talk) 10:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, we should apply for it. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Peer review of Richard Dawkins
Hello Masterpiece. I think that I will submit the Richard Dawkins article for peer review at WikiProject Biography/Peer review. What do you think?--AC+79 3888 (talk) 17:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I think that's a good idea. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have submitted it here. Regards.--AC+79 3888 (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think that's a good idea. Perhaps the Richard Dawkins Foundation could provide some images? AC+79 3888 (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I will try to find some free images of Dawkins. AC+79 3888 (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I found a nice image which the user on Flickr kindly agreed to make available to us. I have added it to the page. Regards.AC+79 3888 (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Kindness is widespread here :)
Serious admiration to you for doing it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the award. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

What's up?
Hey! Just wanted to see how your doing! Life going well? My goal is to make friends with every single person on wikipedia! Will you be my wiki-friend?

216.229.227.142 (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure! I think you should create an account. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Preity
Hey friend!! Thanks for supporting me with the Preity Zinta article. Once the PR is over I'll repropose it. Regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  16:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Rationalism / Richard Dawkins
Hello M2000. Thanks for your suggestion. I have added the Rationalist Userbox to my page. I think that the Richard Dawkins page is almost Featured Article level, I'd just like to wait for the Peer Review to be completed. It shouldn't be too long until someone takes a look at it. Thanks, AC+79 3888 (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hi M2000.

I really think that the Richard Dawkins article is FA status at this point. The person who did the peer review for me said he thought it was "a very strong article". I know it has not been long since the last review, but so much has changed in the article since then. AC+79 3888 (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for that, M2000. Regards. AC+79 3888 (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have removed the last paragraph in the lead. I think that it probably was unnecessary. Regards. --AC+79 3888 (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not looking too good :(. People seem to have very high standards for this article. I have seen FAs that are nowhere near as good! AC+79 3888 (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't know. I think the sources do suggest that he is outspoken and an antitheist. For example in the citations, this one says:

his famously virulent views on religion, attacking it as a "virus of the mind" and an "infantile regression".

and this one:

RICHARD DAWKINS, the British scientist who has become the high priest of atheism, is launching a crusade in America to win new recruits to the church of nonbelievers.

...but if you think it works better without them, I'm OK with that. I don't think it's very important. Thanks, AC+79 3888 [ talk ] 07:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * M2000, that's fine, I see your point. It is not necessary to include those words in the text. Thanks, AC+79 3888 [ talk ] 13:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the note. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I think most of Ealdgyth's issues have been resolved, but according to his talk page he/she is currently on vacation so cannot update the list! I will try to work out the other stuff as I can. Thanks, AC+79 3888 [ talk ] 22:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

My RfA...
 Thank you... ...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you ;) EyeSerene talk 17:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:
What about the last paragraph of the lead? indopug (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've left a comment about it at FAC. Just explain the necessity of it; it just doesn't flow well for me. indopug (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * He may have delivered those lectures, but what exactly does a list of names like that actually add to the article or to the understanding of the reader? I can tell you for a fact that when a reader comes across a long list of names like that they go "ok so he's given a number of notable lectures, I get the point, I'll just skip this." That's why I want you remove the list. indopug (talk) 04:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, its a very good article, and will get there eventually. indopug (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Amazing!
Thank you. One gets compliments much, much less often than criticism.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Btw, how did you get the 1760 number? The link to this list seems to include redirects, and thus has the count of 4706.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed the part when the articles end and redirects begin. Nifty, thanks :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 03:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Wikitruth
If you look at the discussion I linked, you'll find my reply there about the photo (it's real). I don't remember if I am taller or not than Jimbo... :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey
On the Dawkins FA nomination: how long more will it remain a candidate before a decision is made? We really need the people who raised issues to come back and say that they are happy with it. As for your question on The Extended Phenotype, unfortunately it is the only book by Dawkins which I do not own. I may try to get my hands on it. AC+79 3888 [ talk ] 17:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * M2000, yes I've got The God Delusion. I will add citations where necessary. Regards, AC+79 3888 [ talk ] 18:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Citation added. Regards, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 20:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:WikiProject Poland
Dear Masterpiece2000, WikiProject Poland is really the WP:PWNB. Feel free to add your name there - it is not limited to Poles or even Polish speaking editors, anybody interested in the subject can is most welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 03:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Richard Dawkins FAC
I understand that the FAC process can be pretty stressful, with all the reviews pouring in and each reviewer seemingly demanding that the article be molded to his/her taste. Typically FAC reviewers do not edit the article they are critiquing because of both time and neutrality concerns. May I suggest that you contact people on the related projects (WP:EB, ID etc.) to ask for help in reviewing the article and also responding to other reviewers' comments ? It may also be a good idea to leave a note on the FAC page that the concerns are in the process of being addressed - that way the FA director is unlikely to close the FAC as dormant. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for you suggestions. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it looks like it now, M. :-( But I agree, we will keep working at it and do our best to get it there eventually. Kind regards, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 21:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you too, M2000. We will keep working hard at it. <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 21:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Other stuff
Thanks, M2000. I'll take a look at the articles you have suggested. A lot of my editing time has been taken up with trying to get the Richard Dawkins article to FA status, but hopefully it will be resolved soon. Regards, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 19:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Agnosticism and your comment on my talk page
Masterpiece2000, thanks. Likewise. We'll agree to disagree with civility. All the best. --Ds13 (talk) 06:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The God Delusion publishers
Hello M2000. The UK publisher is Transworld, the US publisher is Bantam Press. That is why there is confusion. As for "location", is the United Kingdom not the place of publication, or does it want something like "Oxford"? Thanks, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 21:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Tibet during the Ming Dynasty
Thank you for your compliments. If you would like to contribute, feel free to do so, but only if you have scholarly sources in mind. I am afraid of citing any more internet web sites than there already is in the article. If you know any journal articles or books that you can access which deals with this subject, feel free to utilize them and improve the article where ever necessary.-- Pericles of Athens  <font color="#0000CD">Talk 13:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Newyorkbrad
See this. I suggest you raise the question there; enough people and this censorship should end.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 08:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * All I know is that Wikipedia Review was involved, along with some photo from Wikimania which might have reveled his identity. Other than that... the rumor mills are spinning, spinning... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 09:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Richard Dawkins
Hi, I responded on my talk page, but maybe we can continue to discuss what to do about that section here. The length of it was one reason I couldn't whole-heartedly support the FA.

I will certainly not revert back to my own version, but don't let your shock of seeing so many sources disappear be the sole judge of what makes it a better article. Something being a reliable source, even a good piece of information, doesn't necessarily improve the article. I think the current version is a painful read, and the backward-forward argumentation there is not in tune with the rest of the article.

Cheers, Merzul (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and I should apologize, I noticed you had to spend some time cleaning up and restoring subsequent edits. I'm very sorry for that. Next time I make such an edit I will self-revert and post a link to my version on the talk-page. Thanks for cleaning up, Merzul (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the your reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thought you might find this useful


Here's the symbol for humanism. I thought you might want to display it on your user or talk page.

Are you working on Humanism articles? What do you think is lacking in Wikipedia's coverage of Humanism?

Thank you for the advice on joining the humanism category. I'd really like to meet more humanists, and so I've joined. I wouldn't have if you hadn't suggested it. Thanks.

By the way, I just noticed that there isn't a Wikipedia:WikiProject Humanism. If you were to create it, I would certainly join.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   07:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Trans! I was thinking about Wikipedia:WikiProject Humanism!! How do you read the mind of a person? I was thinking about it!! I want to create WikiProject Humanism. Humanism is a much broader philosophy than atheism or agnosticism. You are one of the best editors on Wikipedia and it would be great if you help me. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 07:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The first step is to figure out what the WikiProject's goals should be. What does the subject "Humanism" on Wikipedia need?  You may want to start at List of basic humanism topics in surveying/exploring the subject.  I find the basic topic lists to be exceptional tools for mapping subjects as I explore them.  Maybe you will too.   Th e Tr ans hu man ist    07:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The goal of the project should be to improve Humanism-related articles. People still don't understand much about Humanism. We have WikiProject Atheism. Humanism is a much broader philosophy than atheism or agnosticism. I think the project will be helpful. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Just improve existing articles?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist    15:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, now I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Humanism is unnecessary. We already have WikiProject Philosophy. I think we should focus on improving Humanism related articles. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Author names
Sorry about that, should have checked. Cheers, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 17:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi M2000. I am fine, and you? I do not have that book unfortunately, but I will see if I can get a copy and add some stuff, because I agree that it should be included. Regards, <font face=tahoma color=#339900>AC+79 3888 <font color=#FF0000>[ <font color=#FF0000>talk ] 21:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
For supporting. :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  09:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome! Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Tibet during the Ming Dynasty
Thank you for your support! I'm glad that you are a fan of the article. It involved a lot of hard work on my part (with major contributions by User:Bertport), but it looks great now.-- Pericles of Athens  <font color="#0000CD">Talk 18:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * And might I add, you have a very impressive list of created articles, 130 so far! Bravo! Good job on that.-- Pericles of Athens  <font color="#0000CD">Talk 19:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

History of the British salt tax in India
Thank you very much :-). I've wikified the article a bit. I think now its pretty good. - Ravichandar <sub style="color:aqua; font-family:Monotype Corsiva;">My coffee shop 11:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

NSS page
Hi Masterpiece

Thanks for the entries you've put up about the NSS. We've started being more active with our entry now so maybe we could work together to make an even better resource. Hope to hear from you.

NSS xx

National Secular Society (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Then we look forward to working with you in June.

National Secular Society (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Stefan Banach
Dear Masterpiece, thank you for adding your voice in the matter of the "Stefan Banach" article, which has been plagued recently by one of those misguided or unbalanced individuals who prowl the halls of Wikipedia.

How are things lately with you? What is holding up the "Richard Dawkins" FA status? Since the subject of the article has previously contributed to it, why not appeal to him to resolve any substantive questions — by email, if it's turned on? It was a fine article months ago, and should be promoted without further unnecessary delay. Nihil novi (talk) 06:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello Nihil novi. Thank you for your comment. I am interested in the history of mathematics. Stefan Banach was a Polish mathematician. It is a well-known fact.


 * I am fine. I think the article Richard Dawkins should be nominated for the FA status in June. There are still some problems. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Just to say hai
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Have a great day ! -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 11:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F0F0FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAACC;"> Hello Masterpiece2000, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you!  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi Masterpiece2000; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk  22:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Sociology in Poland
I plan to expand it to a DYKable size today. Despite all my writings about history of Poland, I am supposed to be getting a PhD in sociology so... :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, masters in eco and soc and aiming for phd in soc. I want to write economic history of Poland one of those days, too... :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Ditto
<div style="background-color: white; border: #5B92E5 solid 2px; margin-bottom:.5em; padding: 5px; font-family: trebuchet ms, sans-serif;"><font color="#084C9E">, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. I don't understand the question exactly. Saving images from wiki works just like any other website, right-click and 'save'. --Soman (talk) 15:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Soman (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I try working along a 0.1% formula, that at least one out of thousand of the articles at English wikipedia would be created by myself. That approach is not uncontroversial, there is a community argument that the main problem at wikipedia is the lack of quality rather than quantity. I do actually agree with that assumption in principle, but generally I tend to have interest in subjects and regions that are less covered in wikipedia, along the lines of WP:CSB. --Soman (talk) 07:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sociology of the Internet
Yes, I plan to expand it soon :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

A word of thanks
Thank you very much :-) - Ravichandar <sub style="color:aqua; font-family:Monotype Corsiva;">My coffee shop 16:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Biography of Carlos Minc
Hi Masterpiece. Excuse me for this delay. Nowadays, I'm reviewing and improving all the president Lula's ministers biography. I promisse, I will improve all english biography of them after this journey. You can require!!! Regards, --Mwaldeck (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

PS: I'd uploaded a new photo of Minc at Commons with english legend and I'd put the infobox with some data. A short improve. Can you review that??? Regards.

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: post on my talk page
Umm, thanks! (Sorry, it's late where I am, and I can't figure out why you wrote me that...) J.d <font color="#00ff00">ela  noy gabs analyze  03:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

ideas
Hi Masterpiece, regarding your comments on the RCC FAC page: I am going to bed, it is 1AM where I live. I look forward to seeing your ideas, I just did not want you to think I was ignoring you if I did not resond right away. NancyHeise (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * When I am done with the RCC page I was considering a little bit of work on the Roman Catholic theology page. If you are interested I would appreciate your help in possibly presenting the "other side" of the argument to make it NPOV. Also, I laughed when I saw your comment on my talk page. I hope you still love your mother and respect her beliefs, she probably prays for you - which even if your not religious could be interpreted as an act of love. NancyHeise (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * There is a person responding to your last comment on the RCC page. I just want you to know that I dont know who the person is, he or she is not one of the editors of the RCC page. We have had a little drama on the page with reviewers confusing responses from the page editors with responses from other people. NancyHeise (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Crestwood
Can I ask why the Suburban Areas revision I made to the Thornlie article has been repeatedly reversed? - NoTRACEofPENGUINS
 * That's because you haven't provided any sources. Regards, Masterpiece2000   ( Talk ) 05:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

RCC FAC
(hugging my computer with your user screen on it) Thank you! And I absolutely hope that we will see each other again on Wikipedia and maybe work together on an article or two providing different points of view! Thanks again. NancyHeise (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)