User talk:Mastrchf91/Archive 1

SEC Fanfare image
I noticed you uploaded an image called Image:SECFanfareticket.JPG. I feel that the image of the ticket taken with your digital camera is of low quality. Is there anyway you could scan the ticket and upload that image? If you do not have a scanner, any local Kinko's or other document company have scanning capabilities for a very nominal price. I believe the article would be greatly enhanced with a clearer picture. If you have any questions, let me know.--NMajdan &bull;talk 21:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:000 0151.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:000 0151.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Filter (water)
Did you even read what you reverted or the edit summary?

Come back and talk to me after you have done so.Montco 03:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Obviously that description isn't clear enough for you. Well here's the detailed answer.  That page has a tendency to become one of the larger spam farms out here and i monitor it for a reason.  If you take the time to read the edit summary and come back and talk to me like a real person instead of sending some jackass vandal warning you'll get a lot further around here.  Montco 03:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My talk page is blank because it discourages communication. My work in spamfighting and vandal fighting stands on its own.  Now our transaction is complete so piss off and bother someone else.

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 01:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Baseball template
Done.↔NMajdan &bull;talk 19:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Marcus Monk
The article Marcus Monk has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Generally, football players must be playing professionally in order to be considered notable. See WP:N. NawlinWiki 13:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Arkansas Razorbacks Baseball 2007 Season
An editor has nominated Arkansas Razorbacks Baseball 2007 Season, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion would be greatly appreciated
Hello there, I am a fellow member of Wikiproject jazz. I was wondering, if you had a moment to spare, if you would be willing to give your opinion on a matter at Categories for discussion/Log/2007 June 15 concerning a category I created. The category is, and it has been proposed that the article be merged with Musicians of New Orleans and American jazz musicians. This is precisely why I created the category, because it seemed to me the birthplace of jazz music and continous modern symbol of jazz certainly deserves a category unto itself. Regardless of your opinion, I would greatly appreciate your input there so as to have a discussion over the matter. Thanks. (Mind meal 03:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC))

WikiProject College Baseball
I thought that you might like to know that the above project is now listed on the Project Directory on the Sports page. However, given the lack of members, I was wondering if you might also want to contact the existing WikiProject Baseball to see if they would be agreeable to letting this group set up as a subproject of them. That would save the need for creation of additional templates and so on. Good luck with the project! John Carter 21:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

New categories for jazz musicians
Hello fellow member of WikiProject Jazz! I am delivering this message to all members of the project to inform them of a major addition to the evolution of this project. Please see Category:Jazz musicians by genre to familiarize yourselves with the new categories for jazz musicians. Most of the genre categories contain sub-genres in their drop-down menus, so be sure to open them up! I am sending this to everyone to speed up the population of these categories. The sub-genres have been carefully researched to ensure they belong under their corresponding "mother genre"! And please, when in doubt do not categorize something via an assumption. Well, that about covers it! Any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.(Mind meal 05:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC))

Fair use disputed for Image:Artporter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Artporter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Fanfareposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fanfareposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheReturn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheReturn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)