User talk:Matejew2/sandbox

Group 1 Doing the Review
Review #1 REACTuiuc123 (talk) 04:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC) The page looks pretty good, like the Chem box on the right looks good, and it looks like you have some good references for the page. But, I think you should incorporated more into the page, longer paragraphs and things like that, and also you need to have one more reference to get all the points for the references. The references should also have the in-text citations for them, which are not there. Thanks!

Review #2 This is a good start. Your Chem box is looking pretty good although it would be nice if the picture wasn't so blurry. Obviously, you know you just need more information on the page. You have a good set of references so use them. Try adding titles of sections to get you started. Background, uses, reactivity, things like that will help you start writing.

Review #3 The ChemBox was very organized and the sources agreed with each other. Good job on getting reliable information. I also tried to look up any creditable sources so that you can add more information to the page, but not much came up. If you can find journal articles on the synthesis of the oxalate, this can add to a new section of reactions. I was able to find one synthesis and characterization article on PubMed. Check it out and best of luck on the research. Reviewer: Kevin Dinh, Group 1, netID: kdinh2, Review No.3 Reactorgo22 (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)