User talk:MathXplore/Archive

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Q-Saalschütz summation formula


The article Q-Saalschütz summation formula has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No context, no indication of the formula's significance, and not at all meaningful to anyone not already having an expert knowledge of the background. Unsuitable for an encyclopaedia aimed at the general reader."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heine's summation formula


The article Heine's summation formula has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No context, no indication of the formula's significance, and not at all meaningful to anyone not already having an expert knowledge of the background. Unsuitable for an encyclopaedia aimed at the general reader."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heine's summation formula


The article Heine's summation formula has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOT a math textbook; this is a bunch of formulas with no context and no claim of importance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Heine's summation formula for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heine's summation formula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heine's summation formula until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Q-Saalschütz summation formula for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Q-Saalschütz summation formula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Q-Saalschütz summation formula until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''There's only 1 edit summary in your 50 most recent contribs. Even minor edits should have summaries to help see what was done. Thanks.'' –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 15:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Placement
Hi MathXplore,

You recently made an addition to the lead of basic hypergeometric series. The purpose of the lead section of an article is to summarize the body. Unfortunately, your addition does not reflect the body at all. Rather than reverting, I want to suggest that you remove that addition from the lead, and instead find an appropriate place in the article body (possibly a new, short section) to include it. --JBL (talk) 01:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Massive list conversion to multicolumn format
Hi

It appears that you are engaged in a massive conversion of lists from single-column format to a multiple-column format. You don't give any reason for this change. In many cases (not all), the list items have more than one line before your edit, which results in more than four lines  after you edits, which makes more difficult to have an overview of the list. Also, in at least one case, after your edit, a part of the list was hidden by an image.

Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, has decided (Requests_for_arbitration/Sortan).

Your format change of lists falls clearly under this decision, a may thus lead to an edit ban. So, please, revert yourself these edits, as leaving the job to other editors would be WP:disruptive editing. D.Lazard (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)