User talk:Mathapatirachayya

Welcome!
Hello, Mathapatirachayya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Karnataka State Women's University have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Muhandes (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Gundawan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gundawan, Mathapatirachayya!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please remember to check for missing references if you copy-and-paste certain parts from another article."

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 16:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BIJAPUR AGROMETEOROLOGICAL SERVICES.


A tag has been placed on BIJAPUR AGROMETEOROLOGICAL SERVICES., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://agrometbijapur.org/3clayout.aspx?CID=1. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Largoplazo (talk) 14:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Creating articles
Hi. Thanks a lot for creating many articles. It is appreciated a lot. But instead of creating so many articles rapidly, would you please work on one article properly and then move to next article? Currently, the articles have a little odd grammar, and most of them dont have any citations/references at all. I would recommend concentrating on one article at a time, and once the article is in good shape, only then to create another article. If you have any doubts/questions, please free to ask me. Regards, — usernamekiran (talk)  19:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jainapur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nagaral, Bijapur
Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Mathapatirachayya, thanks for creating Nagaral, Bijapur!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 17:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Lack of sources
You've been getting a lot of messages about this, but all articles need sources, and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator. I tried to review Adavisangapur but it has no verified information at all. It has an external link, is that actually the source? If so, can you change the heading to 'Sources' or 'References' to make this clear? You might also find reading WP:Communication is required, when editors have repeatedly tried to discuss with you an aspect of your editing, you do need to respond. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Same for Alaginal and Bellubbi. Boleyn (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your addition to Tikota has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Warning
I'm disappointed that you have not responded to previous messages; please be aware that WP:Communication is required. If editors contact you several times on similar issues, you are required to respond. You are also continuing to create unreferenced articles. If this continues, it will need to be referred to WP:ANI. Please reference clearly all article you create. Please respond to this message. Boleyn (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I concur with . I politely informed him about the issue, and even offered help. No response. — usernamekiran (talk)  22:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Automated article creation - please include references, and declare if you are being paid
Hi. It looks like you are creating a large number of articles on Indian villages semi-automatically. There's nothing wrong with that in principle, but you have ommitted references in every single one of them. Nor have you responded to other editors' questions. You allude to a 2011 census, but you don't include a reference, nor do you cite sources to back up information about local farming practices, or the very detailed climate table in each one. How does anyone know whether all this information is correct, or simply made up by you? You must address this issue in all future pages you create, and go back and edit earlier pages and insert these sources, as it is not fair to expect other volunteers to clean up after your failure to follow Wikipedia's guidelines on this. I am sure you would agree it would be a shame if all the pages you made were to be removed for want of a little extra effort and referencing on your part.

I must also ask you to declare on your Talk Page (both on en.wiki and kn.wiki) whether you have any Conflict of interest? In other words, you have an obligation to declare if you are receiving payment from any organisation or government body for creating all these pages. You are not prevented from doing this, but we do require transparency here. Please read WP:PAY and WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE to understand your obligations and how to clarify any paid Wikipedia article creation you are doing (whether as part of your normal job, or for a one-off fee). Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop
You've been asked many times to source your creations and also not copy paste content, yet you're continuing to do the same and refusing to communicate. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and communication is necessary as is compliance with our policies. If you continue this behavior of yours then your editing privileges will be removed. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)