User talk:MathewTownsend/Archive 4

FA nomination for Icelandic Phallological Museum
As the reviewer a few months ago of the GA nomination of Icelandic Phallological Museum, I thought you might be interested to know that I've nominated it for featured article status. The nomination is at Featured article candidates/Icelandic Phallological Museum/archive1. You're very welcome to comment, if you have any views on the matter. Prioryman (talk) 21:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Ruma Maida
Can you do the write-up on this one? Same reason as usual. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Although, keeping in mind that we considered me having an interview a while back, I could probably leave the entire write-up alone if you think this is a good week for that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ok, will do. As for interview, how about for the issue after this? MathewTownsend (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure. Alright, I'll do some work on this issue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's just that there isn't time to come up with questions, do the interview (your answers) and edit it for the upcoming issue. Don't you think? (Plus I'm still struggling with figuring out how to not feel bad when editing here. Even Featured content is starting to become "watched" - no mistakes. Not peaceful anymore.) MathewTownsend (talk) 00:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you need a break, no need to worry. I think you may like content creation even if it doesn't get a plus or a star; I've done a bit of work on that, like at Babi Island (Aceh). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * K, do you want me to do the rest of the blurbs? Don't want to risk an edit conflict. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can do the rest, now that I've dipped my toe in. Is the blurb on Ruma Maida ok? MathewTownsend (talk) 13:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hisar (city)
Hello! I saw this article about my city. It was full of wrong information, violating copyright laws by directly copying data from websites and providing information that was not useful. So, I have written it from scratch providing as much relevant information as I can along with citations. Now, the article is complete according to me and I have nominated it for good article and I want you to review it. Please let me know if there is anything missing or anything relevant or anything not following Wikipedia standards so that I can correct it. And if everything is correct, then please review it and approve its nomination. Thanks. Vishal14K Vishal14K 18:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, I looked at the article and at first glance it looks very interesting and well done. However, I'm not an expert on India or articles on cites, so I'll go through the article but I can't make any promises. Looks like you did a good job thought! Best, MathewTownsend (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for !voting

 * Congratulations, Crisco! I have no worries about your performance as an admin. All is good! Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool, Version 5
Hey all :)

Just a quick update on what we've been working on:
 * The centralised feedback page is now live! Feel free to use it and all other feedback pages; there's no prohibition on playing around, dealing with the comments or letting others know about it, although the full release comes much later. Let me know if you find any bugs; we know it's a bit odd in Monobook, but that should be fixed in our deployment this week.
 * On Thursday, 7th June we'll be holding an office hours session at 20:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. We'll be discussing all the latest developments, as well as what's coming up next; hope to see you all there!
 * Those of you who hand-coded feedback; I believe I contacted you all about t-shirts. If I didn't, drop me a line and I'll get it sorted out :).

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Making the Wikipedia Education Program Meeting better
Thanks for expressing interest in the Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. I'm investigating ways to make the meeting more effective, and I'd love to get feedback from you as to what we could do to improve the meeting. Please weigh in on the discussion there! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk)

 If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 01:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Question about coverage
moin Mathew, i addressed some of your points here. one side note on the diff-link i provided on education: i sent you an email as i was looking into education at the time, because i was (vaguely) aware that you also took the time to look at this program. in fact most likely went through far greater length than i did then. the mail could have been sent the same day, april 26, actually. please consider to check your mail box regarding it :), all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * thanks, Mathew. that is indeed as unusual as it is unfortunate; happened only twice over the years, as far as i know, that mails from or towards me got lost in wikipedia's very own email system. however, if you like, we can still look into the topic; july is some way down the track, so there is still time to deal with it properly, all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I did find your email. Let me study it and figure out what you are saying. I'm not sure what you are asking. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * okay, i re-wrote it from re-collection (i can't restore it inside wikipedia's system (or at least i don't know how)) just minutes ago. so there might be some differences but i'm glade it finally surfaced. so lets look into this issue complex together :), all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

GA drive
Hi there. Just letting you know of the upcoming GA drive, set to start on the 15th. Sending you a message since you were a top reviewer in the last one, and of course the backlog needs all the help it can get right now. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Four
Hi! Welcome to the fourth issue of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter for the Teahouse!


 * Teahouse pilot wraps up after 13 weeks After being piloted on English Wikipedia starting in February, the Teahouse wrapped up its pilot period on May 27, 2012. We expect this is just the beginning for the Teahouse and hope the project will continue to grow in the months to come!

Thank you and congratulations to all of the community members who participated - and continue to participate!


 * What you've all been waiting for: Teahouse Pilot Report is released! We look forward to your feedback on the methodology and outcomes of this pilot project.
 * ....and if a pilot report wasn't enough, the Teahouse Pilot Metrics Report is out too! Dive into the numbers and survey results to learn about the impact the Teahouse has made on English Wikipedia.
 * Teahouse shows positive impact on new editor retention and engagement
 * 409 new editors participated during the entire pilot period, with about 40 new editors participating in the Teahouse per week.
 * Two weeks after participating, 33% of Teahouse guests are still active on Wikipedia, as opposed to 11% of a similar control group.
 * New editors who participated in the Teahouse edit 10x the number of articles, make 7x more global edits, and 2x as much of their content survives on Wikipedia compared to the control group.


 * Women participate in the Teahouse 28% of Teahouse participants were women, up from 9% of editors on Wikipedia in general, good news for this project which aimed to have impact on the gender gap too - but still lots to be done here!
 * New opportunities await for the Teahouse in phase two as the Teahouse team and Wikipedia community examine ways to improve, scale, and sustain the project. Opportunities for future work include:
 * Automating or semi-automating systems such as invites, metrics and archiving
 * Experimenting with more ways for new editors to discover the Teahouse
 * Building out the social and peer-to-peer aspects further, including exploring ways to make answering questions easier, creating more ways for new editors to help each other and for all participants to acknowledge each other's efforts
 * Growing volunteer capacity, continuing to transfer Teahouse administration tasks to volunteers whenever possible, and looking for new ways to make maintenance and participation easier for everyone.

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Want to know how you can lend a hand at the Teahouse? Become a host! Learn more about what makes the Teahouse different than other help spaces on Wikipedia and see how you can help new editors by visiting here.
 * Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is really encouraging to new Wikipedians.

Hyedrabadi Haleem
Hi, Thanks for your comprehensive review at Hyderabadi Haleem, Please see my updated corrections and remarks at Talk:Hyderabadi haleem/GA1. And advice if any more corrections are required before proceeding for GA. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 05:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, hope you had noticed that, we had replaced all the possible unreliable sources and PR advices identified by you, and the article is okay now to move for GA. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 15:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

BR NFSB
 Imzadi 1979  →   18:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Wiknic Miami event June 23
If St Augustine is too far for you, then you can check out Meetup/Miami/Wiknic/2012!--Pharos (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 release coming up - help us design a banner!
Hey all :). First-off, thanks to everyone for all their help so far; we're coming up to a much wider deployment :). Starting at the end of this month, and scaling up until 3 July, AFT5 will begin appearing on 10 percent of articles. For this release we plan on sending out a CentralNotice that every editor will see - and for this, we need your help :). We've got plans, we know how long it's going to run for, where it's going to run...but not what it says. If you've got ideas for banners, give this page a read and submit your suggestion! Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

GA?
Hey Mathew,

There's a request for a (relatively) short notice GA review at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disability, and you poped into my head as someone as someone who can pull a good, thorough GA review out of the bag for that sort of thing. If your busy then no problem - I'll take a look at it this weekend, I just thought I'd check if you where availible first - normally I try not to review other disability articles because I feel a little close to them, Cheers Fayedizard (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, I'm sorry to let you down. But it's a long article on a topics I know nothing about, on some sports I've never heard of, and I don't have access to any of the sources. And I've never dealt with an article with so many big tables etc. So I wouldn't be an editor that could provide an adequate GA review, I'm afraid.  But thanks for thinking about me! Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk)
 * Thank you so much for that hour you spent editting today - much much appreciated :) I suspect that's going to make my life much easier - thank you so much! Fayedizard (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! It's a pleasure to learn what I do from your articles. MathewTownsend (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Talk:1919 Polish coup attempt in Lithuania/GA1
Thanks, replied there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, replied there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, replied. And by all means, I have more articles at GA, feel free to check them out if you'd like to read more about Polish history :) PS. In fact, the Suwałki Agreement article that I have also GANed can be seen as the good "what happened next". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 22:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * hey, I've been looking at that article. Will do! MathewTownsend (talk) 22:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Blackford County, Indiana
Thanks for reviewing Blackford County, Indiana. I will be traveling Saturday, but will have access to the internet beginning Sunday or Monday. Are you related to former Blackford County resident and former governor M. Clifford Townsend?TwoScars (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No, never been to Blackford County! MathewTownsend (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reviewing Blackford County, and I am glad it was enjoyable reading.TwoScars (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Sadler
Is now an FA, congratulations. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Horsefield
Thanks for considering the John Horsefield for GAN. I look forward to your comments. - Sitush (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the comments and in particular the opening remark. My mother has promised some of his daffodils for my birthday later this year. There is only one place in Britain that appears to sell them and, living in Whitefield as I do, it will be nice to "bring them home". The only snag is, I am not remotely green-fingered & there could well be a case of narcissus murder before next spring! Is it ok if I intersperse my replies to your comments or would you prefer then en bloc at the end of the review section? - Sitush (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Interspersing is fine (as long as its clear whose saying what)! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I've addressed those issues that I can, and raised a few queries of my own. I hope that you do not consider me to be argumentative - it is certainly not intended in that way. Thanks again. - Sitush (talk) 21:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No. I was just about to pass the article when I got the orange message banner. I don't think any of the issues are worth arguing about or preventing a GA. Perhaps the blockquote issue bothers me the most, but probably there's no fixed rule, so ..... I'll drop it. This man and these botanists are wonderful to read about. MathewTownsend (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks very much. I will bear the unresolved comments in mind and in particular I will be checking on my use of "teetotal" vs "the teetotaler". I am really pleased that you enjoyed the content as a "story". There is quite a bunch of these people, including one or two women (particularly unusual, at that time, especially in pubs). I've recently created Category:Botanists from Lancashire because the movement was significant and more articles will follow. I like social history even though I really know nothing about botany. If I ever get to Manchester Central Library, which has been shut for a couple of years for refurbishment, then there is a chance that I may take this one to FA. - Sitush (talk) 23:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, these people are quite remarkable. I've run across articles about people like this before. Even Charles Darwin, who had a medical education, seems to have been largely self educated and driven by the pure desire to seek knowledge and his love of nature. I remember especially his Fertilisation of Orchids. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a nice article. I am amazed that there isn't one for Culpeper's Herbal, but maybe one day ... - Sitush (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I've just nominated Richard Buxton for GAR. Perhaps as you're already familar with the article you might consider doing the review? You could then bag a brace of Lancashire Botanists :-) Richerman ''   (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you asking me, or Sitush? Sitush is the one that wrote the article that I reviewed. I don't have special expertise on the subject - I just like reading about these botanists! MathewTownsend (talk) 13:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You. He wouldn't be daft enough to ask me! - Sitush (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you of course Mathew - but I see you're already onto it. And don't worry about not having any expertise in botany, neither have I - or Sitush for that matter. We just like writing about botanists - oh! and, in my case, self-taught astronomers.  Richerman ''   (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Richard Buxton is about botany but also about the life of a labouring man in those times. A wonderful article. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * At least one person is perhaps not appreciating the situation! - Sitush (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Imzadi 1979  →   04:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ping for I-696.  Imzadi 1979  →   19:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Li Wangyang
Thanks for taking up the review. It's all true the points you raised, It's gone midnight here, so I'll sort out the details in the morning. Cheers, -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 16:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * yeah, don't worry about the time. Take the time you need. MathewTownsend (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free stuff
Hi Mathew, I just saw the thread on WT:GAN. I passed Brushstrokes series a couple weeks back, do you think their is too much non-free content on that? Copyright issues didn't occur to me when I was doing the review, but it is pretty heavy on the quotes. Any thoughts? Mark Arsten (talk) 03:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Having looked at several of the articles in the series, I think it relies way too heavily on quotes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was a major screw-up on my part, I just culled most of the non-free content. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

re GAN Suwałki Agreement
Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Centralized discussion
Instead of having four separate discussions, I have centralized the discussion at Talk:Brushstrokes series'''. Post all comments on the proposed merger there.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your congratulations
Mathew, without the efforts of yourself and all of the other editors who reviewed Doc Adams as it developed, it could never have become featured. Thank you for the well wishes, and for your role in helping the article gain FA status. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 02:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Pinkan Mambo
Hi Mathew, I've replied to your review at Talk:Pinkan Mambo/GA1. The article's been pumped up another 1500 characters. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Appreciate your efforts and will take a look. MathewTownsend (talk) 00:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: Chataan
Hey, I hope things are good now! --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for the review. If you ever need anything reviewed, feel free to shout my way. :) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Unionskirche
Thank you for supplying the perfect gift for the anniversary of my "blackest" period on Wikipedia (s. my user or talk), face fail at 1 am. I invited to improve the article, please keep it watched. Thank you for your valuable input, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Deeply apologize for adding to your "blackest" period on Wikipedia. I admire a great many things you do, including and especially your work for PumpkinSky. You're immensely responsible for improving the atmosphere here between editors by your wonderful attitude. Please take the GA fail as a opportunity to clarify your thoughts about what you want in the article Unionskirche, Idstein - in fact there may be more than one article on the material e.g. one on the church (building), one on the paintings, one on present day music, etc.


 * Also, you can learn a great deal about how to build an article for GAN by reviewing articles at Good article nominations. Doing so makes you think: "hey, what do these GA criteria mean?" Following the GA criteria enables writing a GA. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * No, you didn't, add to blackness I mean, it just seemed so fitting ;) I didn't enjoy the appearance of BWV 76 as lead DYK on 7 July 2011 at all, but now - as you hopefully saw - I proudly present it myself. Unionskirche: you are right about many things, please allow some time to act on it. (I thought I had seven days, I really did.) - I do a lot of reviewing for DYK, always trying to improve the articles. GA is too high for my language skills, - but it's my initials ;) - Did you see (on my talk) that you were already part of turning the blackness to brighter when you reviewed Noel F. Parrish? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't understand about the blackness (and didn't see Noel F. Parrish on your page), but I'm glad I didn't contribute to it! Without the hold, you don't have to hurry. You'll have time to think. It sounds to me that your interest may be more the paintings and the present day music than the church itself. So you could retitle (or start a new article) on the subject of you interest rather than to learn architecture etc. (If you're not interested in architecture, then learning it could be a chore.) MathewTownsend (talk) 13:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Possibly "Kirche" doesn't translate well to "church"? The "church itself" (any church) is for me the building + the history + the people + the services + the music, I will improve with that in mind, but not nominate the article for GA again, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want to understand the blackness, just click on the contribs of BarkingMoon: BWV 10, BWV 76, so long, - it made me close to leaving myself, but I am happy I didn't --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you explain more what the links to BarkingMoon mean? and why it was "blackness"? I think you can write the article any way you want. It's only if it comes up for review e.g. GAN or FAC that questions of organization, compliance with MoS standards etc. arise. Many editors write for their own pleasure and not to collect rewards! MathewTownsend (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Explain: it's on my user, but I summarize: he promoted the two cantatas to lead DYK, and after the latter one left Wikipedia, just follow the links. His talk tells you a lot, I take care of it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not understanding. BarkingMoon promoted the two cantatas to lead DYK, but then he asks to be blocked? Why did he ask to be blocked? MathewTownsend (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You follow his (!) link on "So long", please, and/or browse the talk page from the beginning. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

well, I did follow a bunch of links and ended up on a page where the last comment made to BarkingMoon was by an admin who is now banned forever, User:Will Beback. I can't say I understand what's going on there. Why doesn't BarkingMoon ask to be unblocked? MathewTownsend (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Next day, after church (the other one): easy answer, but not too helpful: I don't know. Or, as the one you mentioned above (and "forever" meens 6 months) said: "We'll never know the true story". Trying to unfold a bit: I was a happy content editor, not caring about the background of WP, until Rlevse became a victim of WP:Great Dismal Swamp in November 2010. I couldn't believe it, posted against it, but then shrugged and returned to content. When BarkingMoon appeared in May 2011, enough people thought he was a sockpuppet of Rlevse to make him leave. (You know what SPI means?) - This time I did what I could to fight it. It took a while but was rather successful. Now he could return. But I would not be surprised if he never looked back here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:26, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ps: we miss more than that one, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ps: what you saw on User:Rlevse until 22 June 2012 was that the page had been deleted, - not even a history, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 9 July 2012 (UTC)