User talk:Mathewanderson7232/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finalist of the Intel ISEF (May 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finalist of the Intel ISEF (May 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_from_Idegon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finalist of the Intel ISEF (May 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_from_Idegon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Finalist_of_the_Intel_ISEF reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Mercury Precision Components for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mercury Precision Components is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mercury Precision Components until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, just a note about how communication at an AfD (and on talk pages in general) works. If you are responding to me, you should indent your posts (see WP:INDENT for instructions on this) - this will make it clear, when others have commented, who is responding to whom. I've done it for you at the AfD, so no action required from you there. Also, please don't use another user's signature to address them - just use their username. If you want to send them a notification that you've replied to them, type their username like this: user:Girth Summit . You can read more about this at WP:PING. Finally, I commented on your latest addition to the page on the AfD discussion - I'm afraid the new source you added is another mention in a business directory - please do take a look at WP:CORPDEPTH, it's worth reading. For any article about a business, we need independent, secondary references, in reliable sources, giving significant coverage - I genuinely did try to find some before nominating your article for deletion, but I wasn't able to. By all means keep looking, but please understand that nothing that is written by the company themselves, or is just a short mention in a business directory, would be acceptable. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  06:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)