User talk:MathieuQuisefit

Re:Deletion of article about Calaméo
Hi MathieuQuisefit. Although it may have not been your intent, your article read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles (See WP:OTHERSTUFF). You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Calameo


The article Calameo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This page has already been speedily deleted via the G12 criteria in the past under the name but has now been recreated by the same author. It is an advertisement and the company itself does not meet the notability guidelines set forth for organizations.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tejanse (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)