User talk:Mathmensch/Archives/2017/August

Accusation of edit-war
When an edit is undone and a request is made to discuss something on the talk page, please don't edit-war. I'm also confused by your rationale, that your edit was a citation. You didn't add a citation. You added an allegation that "[Generally, the pro-choice position] argues that... at the point of abortion, the fetus is insufficiently developed to constitute a life form."

Respectfully, I think that this is a misrepresentation of the pro-choice position. I also think that it is a misrepresentation that the pro-life position is very fond of using, because of how vaguely a "life form" is defined.

Triacylglyceride (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Mea culpa, I see your edit on the talk page. Headed there now.

Triacylglyceride (talk) 02:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * A single revert does not constitute an edit war. I cited the pro-choice position. For the interested bypasser, the article's edit history can be found by clicking Abortion and then pressing the "history" button. --Mathmensch (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Tele2 Netherlands
I've addressed several of the issues raised for Tele2 Netherlands. – Editør (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)