User talk:Mathmensch/Archives/2017/February

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graph (topology) (February 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Graph (topology) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades Godric 11:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I have put the article into WP nonetheless, for the following reasons:
 * The article does not describe "graphs as topological spaces", but rather one possibility to associate to a graph a topological space. It would be difficult anyway to turn a graph into a topological space, since it's an ordered pair. There are several ways of associating to a graph a topological space, as can be seen above; obviously, the results are not homeomorphic.
 * The article is quite extensive by now.
 * The section "graphs as topological spaces" in the article "topological graph theory" is inaccurate and will be corrected by me in short order.--Mathmensch (talk) 12:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mathmensch
User:Mathmensch, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mathmensch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mathmensch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I closed this today as keep. The consensus was clear that there's no policy violation or anything inappropriate. Plus, it seems clear to me from your long history of mainspace contributions that you are here to build an encyclopedia, so there's no reason to think your userpage just exists for personal webhosting. Cheers :) &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)