User talk:Mathmensch/Archives/2017/January

information
Hi! Ich schreib einfach mal in Deutsch. Habe kurz mal in Deine Userseite reingeschaut. Das wort information gibt's in Englisch nur in der Einzahl (uncountable noun). Sorry, falls Du das als Pedanterie ansiehst. War nicht als solche gemeint - nur ein kleiner Hinweis. Ansonsten All the best Wikirictor  • talk •  ediits 13:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Mathmensch (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you find any English mistakes of mine, feel free to correct them straight away! --Mathmensch (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK Wikirictor  • talk •  ediits 15:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Your recent editing history at Vladimir Putin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Apparently, this edit was meant, where I included a pretty sound argument for election fraud committed in favour of Vladimir Putin. I deny the allegation that I have been involved in an edit war. --Mathmensch (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not 'alleging' that you are edit warring: you are edit warring. Please read the policy carefully. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I am not. You have a lot of reading ahead yourself, since, frankly, your reasoning seems to indicate that you have difficulties applying basic definitions. For instance, you have just then once more (without any basis) alleged that I was edit-warring.
 * And a small hint, for the future: Don't do tendentious editing. In the long run, you won't succeed, and I'll help make sure. --Mathmensch (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon? This reads as an attempt to WP:INTIMIDATE me. Suggestion: read WP:AGF and WP:HARASS very, very carefully. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)