User talk:Mathowenw

hi

August 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Journal of Modern Dynamics; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Randykitty (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Hi Randykitty, thanks for your comments. I think the disruptive issues for this page somehow from Praxidicae, as Praxidicae directly removed about 1300 characters without a single explanation. We spent many hours on these material, looking for references on internet and database. Also I leave message to Praxidicae but never get a reply. Instead this user leave many comments in Diannaa page. It seems Praxidicae even does not want quotation to be appeared in Wikipedia and I do not think it is reasonable. In a word, Praxidicae do not answer questions or discuss and I hope you could understand that. Thanks. Mathowenw

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Jmd


A tag has been placed on Template:Jmd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Randykitty, Thanks a lot! Best regards, Mathowenw