User talk:Mathsci/Archive 17

keep your choices open
I can understand why you may want to take a wikibreak, even an indefinite one, but please do not permanently close this and your options to return one day. Slrubenstein  |  Talk 00:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The wikibreak was slightly shorter than anticipated :) In fact, I was asleep during most of it, safe from wikidrama. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 08:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hope to see you back soon. All the best, Verbal   chat  06:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Mathsci (talk) 08:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

You made the right decision
Glad you decided to stay. This would have been a great loss to Wikipedia.--Ramdrake (talk) 11:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Mathsci (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, really pleased you decided not to go. We need people like you here. Know that there are people here who value and respect your contributions. Cheers. Alun (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Mathsci (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. I haven't been active on Wikipedia much lately and I don't know what happened in the recent incident but I'm glad you're still around. Cheers. --Folantin (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Mathsci (talk) 10:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Message Received
Apology accepted. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. I wish you all the best in your future edits to wikipedia. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

The sky is blue
By the way, your recent comments regarding a certain editor were appropriate and made me happy. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 22:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. BTW I very much appreciated your discussion with MastCell and Calisber. Best wishes, Mathsci (talk) 22:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've been told to stay out of it. I'm sitting on my hands.  However, there is so much going on I could just laugh. Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 00:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Photo-montage for Marseille
Hello, could you explain why the photo-montage is "completely unsuitable for template" ? Thank you for precisions. Cordially, En-bateau (talk) 03:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Bonjour, En-bateau ! Unfortunately your collage has been put up for deletion, presumably because of some copyright issues in compiling the image. When you used the flickr images, did you check the copyright types? BTW, bienvenu à l'encyclopédie anglophone ! (Je vois que tu utilises le même pseudo sur la wikipédie française.) Mathsci (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The deletion page on wikimedia commons is here. I think that the two flickr license types are apparently incompatible (view down boulevard d'Athènes and view of Notre-Dame-de-la-Garde). Mathsci (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the answer ! But I don't understand. The two photographs are originally from http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicsuzor/345924229/sizes/o/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/20661491@N04/2149566044/sizes/o/ and I thought that Commons accepts CC-BY and CC-BY-SA licences. Could you explain to me what the problem is ? Thank you for your patience, Cordially, En-bateau (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Bonsoir. There are 2 different categories for flickr that can be put on WP, "attribution license" and "attribution-sharealike license" (the first and last here). Apparently it's not permitted to mix the two licenses in a collage. I liked your collage for other French cities more than the one for Marseille. Some time back I searched the two categories on flickr, but the really nice pictures (eg night-time shots of Cours Julien) were unfortunately not in this category. It might be time to have another look. A bientot, Mathsci (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * All right. In the future, if you have free pictures that you like, tell me and I will make a better montage. Maybe it could be more efficient if I ask to people what they want to see in the montage for their city before make it... Cordially, En-bateau (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * That sounds like an excellent idea. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Ancient Persian problems
You recently contributed to an AfD discussion on an article about ancient Persian history. I have been reviewing the contributions of the editors who have been involved in these and other related articles, and have found a considerable number of issues - bad writing, original research, lack of sourcing or citations, and POV problems. I have posted the results of my review at User:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems (it's a work in progress, as I'm still going through the contributions). Please feel free to add to it and leave any comments at User talk:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems. I would be interested in any feedback that you might have. Thanks in advance. -- ChrisO (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

For God sakes, I was trying to be funny, why do think every complement is a personal attack? And I thought (based on your own description) you were a grown up man, and your feelings would not be hurt... Silly me. Shame on Ariobarza, shame! I'm a joyfull person, what can I say.--Ariobarza (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk


 * Hmm, I'm not sure I understand your sense of humour. I am in Vienna at the moment and in about two hours will be playing Bach on a baroque organ (BWV 658). Is that what you meant by "playing God"?  Mathsci (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you at least agree to put this behind on and move on, I'm currently crowded by a crowd of users that seem to think they are always right. So I do not feel like starting a problem with you (if you were in my shoes you would understand), is that okay, do you accept to be understanding?--Ariobarza (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk


 * I don't have any personal problems with you at all. My advice would be to stay away from the Persian history articles for just a little bit and find somebody to adopt you. Locating sources can be quite hard: for example, without a dedicated academic database, it's probably not so easy to access some specialist texts on ancient history on the web. I made similar remarks to Jonathan Hochman off the WP:AN/I page, because that is far too public a venue to discuss this kind of thing. As you noticed, people might seem to be crowding in on you, making incorrect inferences. That is one of the huge disadvantages of the public noticeboards, where things can randomly spiral out of control. My only advice on contributing is: find your first class secondary source or sources, and then write your article using these. Good luck, Mathsci (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks Mathsci, I am sorry if I offended you earlier. Your absolutely right, I have to get back to editing my articles drafts, and let ChrisO delete all my articles, oh wait, this is my problem. So I have a solution now, I will spend half the time seeing what mess is going on, because I can always recreate articles, and spend the other half working on my drafts, so thanks for giving me advice, I will now follow it to the best of my ability. Thank you again.--Ariobarza (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk


 * Great. Why not write an article on something else you're interested in? (When I'm less busy I intend to start an article on the Great Eighteen Chorale Preludes of Bach.) Anyway good luck again. Mathsci (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Kuban Kazak-Hillock65/Evidence
Just to inform you I have referred to comments you made as part of my evidence in this case. Cheers. --Folantin (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

"The Battle of Elonka"...
This is too funny!!!--Ramdrake (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Categories
Hi Mathsci, this was the problem: there was no colon at the front of "Category:Battles involving the Achaemenid Empire" when someone added it, and it was Wikilinked, so it added her talk page into the category. Typing in "Category:Battles involving the Achaemenid Empire" will add a link to the category, but not add the page to it, while "Category:Battles involving the Achaemenid Empire" will add the page to the category. I only found this out about categories by accident, and my talk page was in "Wikipedian user boxes" for a long time. :) Best wishes and happy editing to you. Acalamari 00:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that makes perfect sense! I don't have to reread Herodotus after all! Interestingly enough on my long 17 hour train journey from Vienna through the Tyrol and Switzerland and then along the Rhone to Aix that ended just over an hour ago, a priest opposite me in the train was reading a very thick book on Babylon. Two days earlier I came face to face with the cylinder of Nebuchadnezzar II in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. Real life can sometimes eerily echo editing on wikipedia. However, far more important in Austria was the Feast of St Martin (11th November) when everyone eats Martinigansl. Mathsci (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)