User talk:Mativiters

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Lexy iris (talk) 12:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Lexy iris. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lexy iris (talk) 15:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Update the pie-charts
I've updated the election result figures from the election office of Iran. These were published three days after the announcement by Ministry of interior. Please update your charts, I 'm temporarily removing them as they're outdated. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding the outdated election results.
Please stop adding the old outdated eleaction results to 2021 Iranian presidential election like you did in this edit. The turned of 48.8% is based on older results published on 20 June.

However checking the official results of the MOI which is based on those announced by Jamal Arf the head of the Election Office,, I don't find what you are claiming is true.

For example the discrepancy you claim in invalid votes doesn't exist. Rather the discrepancy you are claiming is actually number of people who showed up but didn't cast any vote in the ballot boxes:

است، تفاوت عدد مربوط به کل تعرفه های مصرفی (تعرفه های تحویل شده به مراجعه کنندگان شعب) با عدد آرای داخل صندوق های رأی، مربوط به افرادی است که در انتخابات شرکت کردند اما به هر دلیلی, رأی خود را داخل صندوق ها نیانداختند.

So people who didn't cast any votes shouldn't be counted as discrepancy when the MOI itself didn't claim so, nor they are declared invalid at any point. And since they didn't cast votes they shouldn't be a factor in the turnout as well, as turnout only refers to those who voted.

I also don't see any source for your claim that MoI counts non-collected invalid votes, which are around 100,000, regardless the MoI source you used differs from your claim as it doesn't count in those non-collected invalid votes. Therefore I've reverted you. Rather the invalid votes are listed as 3,740,688.

Please don't add your own notes and claims in the articles. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 09:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Nika Shakarami.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Nika Shakarami.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 University of Sharif protests crackdown for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 University of Sharif protests crackdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2022 University of Sharif protests crackdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WWGB (talk) 23:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Khodanur Lojei for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khodanur Lojei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Khodanur Lojei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
An article you recently created, Archcraft, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, place  atop the article, then publish. Silikonz 💬 22:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Archcraft


Hello, Mativiters. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Archcraft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)