User talk:Matkadomu

Welcome!
Hello, Matkadomu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Dahmen (American author) (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Dahmen (American author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 18:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
Hello, Matkadomu! I'm NewYorkActuary. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Response to comments at the Articles for Creation Help Desk
Hello again, Matkadomu. The conversation we had been having at the Help Desk is now in the process of being archived, so I thought it better to respond here. On a minor note, I agree that the Chanticleer review is not quite the same thing as the Chanticleer award. But when we use the winning of an award as evidence that a person has achieved encyclopedic notability, we expect that the award is a prestigious one. There can be reasonable disagreement as to whether a particular award is "prestigious", but I doubt that anyone here on Wikipedia would use that word to describe an award granted by an organization that writes favorable reviews to authors who pay for them. As for the more substantive question, I think your draft on Sarah Dahman is probably not going to be accepted for publication (but feel free to try again -- another reviewer might take a different view than mine). But if you're looking for other women authors to write about, you might want to browse through any of the lists given at Category:American literary awards. For the most prestigious awards, the nominated authors already have articles, but this becomes less true for some of the lesser-known ones. You might well find quite a few good subjects for Wikipedia articles. NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi NewYorkActuary! (Whee- I hope I do this talk page thing properly - I went through the links to see if there was anything special to do but couldn't figure it out exactly...sooo much to learn!) I completely agree about the award now that you explain that it needs to be far more prestigious. I will put aside the one on S. Dahmen for now and try to find other female authors who might be able to get some recognition. We'll see! Thank you so much for your help, patience and support - it has made this initial foray really lovely. Matkadomu (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Matkadomu

Draft:Sara Dahmen (American author) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sara Dahmen (American author), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sara Dahmen (American author)


Hello, Matkadomu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sara Dahmen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)