User talk:Matmoo1997

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. --Pak21 (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Venagol
A tag has been placed on Venagol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unforgiven24 (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Venagol deleted for the 4th time
Hello. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. The subject of the article Venagol does not appear to meet the notability guideline WP:Band. Please review this guideline, and include this information in any future versions. Please read our guidelines on reliable sources and verifiable sources. Any encyclopedia article must have reliable, verifiable sourcing. Please let me know if you feel the deletion was in error. Or you can appeal at WP:DRV. Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim  20:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Venagol
A tag has been placed on Venagol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unforgiven24 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf42 18:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
'''You have been blocked for persistent disruption of Wikipedia through the repeated creation of inappropriate articles. Since this account has never been used for anything productive, the block is indefinite.''' Kafziel Complaint Department 19:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)