User talk:MattFullerUK

August 2022
Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Leonardo DiCaprio, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 18:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NebY (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, regarding your image changes at Charles III, please note the ongoing talk page discussion at Talk:Charles III and make your opinion known there. Please don't keep changing the infobox image while the discussion is ongoing. Thank you, Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United Kingdom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop edit warring to insert different images at Charles III. Please participate in the talk page discussion. Thank you.'' Aoi (青い) (talk) 06:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing on the Charles III page. There is already an ongoing talk page discussion at Talk:Charles III regarding the infobox picture. If you continue to revert image, this may be construed as edit warring and you may be blocked from editing. Sanctaria (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charles III. ''No good ever comes from edit warring, particularly when there is a discussion open on the article talk page. Time to stop it.'' Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

You've tried to upload copyrighted images to the Charles III page several times now. Consider this a final warning. You need to take much more care over copyright issues and check thoroughly the source of any image. Do not rely on wikicommons: there is a lot of disruption there at the moment with people uploading copyrighted images and passing them off as their own. DrKay (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Charles III. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoi (青い) (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)