User talk:MattMatt73

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wellspring Community Peckham (June 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * User:MattMatt73/sandbox/The Wellspring Community Peckham may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:MattMatt73 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:MattMatt73 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispering ( t ) 23:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

COI
If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:27, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've seen your email, but I'm away from home today so it will be tomorrow before I get a chance to see what I can do Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The article won't be restored though, since for legal reasons we can't host copyright violations Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

More
Further to your email, you need to make sure you understand the guidance above. Wikipedia is not free advertising or a blog space, it's an encyclopaedia. I've written a couple of articles about churches (St Nicholas, Blakeney and St Helen's Church, Ashby-de-la-Zouch), and I can assure you that a single church or small group of churches is unlikely to meet our notability criteria. Where they do, as with those grade 1-listed medieval churches, it's usually because of their history or architecture rather than their particular take on religion.

Even if your article hadn't been a copyright violation, there is absolutely nothing to show how it meets the notability criteria, and it's just the organisation talking about itself, rather than being described by independent third-party sources as we require. You mention your interests on your user page, but you must be careful when you write on these or any other topics that you don't add opinions, your own or your church's, just facts sourced to independent good-quality refs. Let me know if you have any queries Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)