User talk:MattQBonner/sandbox

Feedback on Proposed Revisions
Hi, Team No Analog! First, picking an article that's a stub is a smart choice, because you have the opportunity to be adding real value (and it's not contested). Keep in mind that you might see "analog" spelled "analogue" as well; both are correct (the latter is British).

At this stage, you'll want to start drafting your content in your Sandbox (keep editing above what you've worked on previously, so that nothing is lost from your prior work). Make sure you have a good list of primary sources, and outline what your contributions will be. Indicate if and where you'll add images, and make sure any image is shareable (e.g., CC license). Let me know if you have any questions -- you can ping me when your outline is ready, or wait until you've got something more developed. I'll provide feedback on your edits before you start to port them over -- remember that you'll be writing the page in your Sandbox first. IceAgeDoc (talk)

Evaluate an Article
Nice work on your article evaluation! It sounds like you've got a good handle on what would improve the page. As we discussed in class, citing published research is not a copyright violation (that would be posting unattributed text). Excellent work tracking down the citation with a misattributed statement. That's a great contribution. IceAgeDoc (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)