User talk:MattRLHanley

September 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Numerology. Hardyplants (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

And to be absolutely clear about this, we aren't interested in crap you post on Twitter. Read Reliable sources. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It is an example of numerology in the bible. A literal example after the unsourced content requested an example e.g. {according to whom}. I gave a legitimate example to settle the issue. Whether or not you like the content should not be an issue here. It is far from crap. It is the method as applied. MattRLHanley (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Apply the method somewhere else. Wikipedia doesn't base content on contributors own Twitter postings. This is not open to negotiation. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, hold on a bit, I'll publish it in an academic numerology journal and get back to you! Those one's are super popular these days. MattRLHanley (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * So the method applied. Gotcha! Love your tastes. MattRLHanley (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Any journal publishing such vacuous crap wouldn't meet Wikipedia's standards as a reliable source. AndyTheGrump (talk)

Important notice
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)