User talk:Matt 2601 atl

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 17:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of All Time Low members
The article pages for the members of All Time Low were redirected to the band for a reason. These people are not notable outside of the band, and thus do not warrant an article themselves. Do not revert these redirects again. regards. Nouse4aname (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just in case it wasn't clear before. NONE of the members of All Time Low are notable outside of being in the band. Because of this, they do not warrant separate articles. Please stop recreating these articles. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Editing talk pages
Hi regarding your contribution to the Elliot Minor talk page, whenever posting new parts please start it after the discussions not inbetween them as you did to my comment, it would make it appear as i was making comments towards you not the person i was orginal talking to. Thanks Pathfinder2006 (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Changing genres
Please do not alter, add or remove genres from articles. Doing so may be seen as vandalism. In future please discuss such changes on the talk page, and only after a decision has been reached should you change the genre. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -- neon white user page talk 17:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Talk:You Me At Six
A tag has been placed on Talk:You Me At Six, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jakisbak (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Don't remove sourced genres. You've been warned before, which is why this is classified as vandalism.'' tedder (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alex Gaskarth
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alex Gaskarth. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Alex Gaskarth. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)