User talk:Matt Britt

Archives
Previous talk page archives: [1], [2], [3], [4]

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas
Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see.

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 18:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Binary prefixes
I'm surprised you're still able to deal with this sort of mess


 * I'm not; I quit. :)  Too much bullshit around here for it to be fun anymore.

''this situation was one of the things which convinced me that Wikipedia's dispute resolution "system" is completely defunct and not worth participating in any further. The repeated arguments which invariably reduce to familiar squabble and the mass of incomprehensible rhetoric fairly effectively annihilate any hope for progress. There are obvious attempts on both sides to exploit the flawed notion of consensus in order to stagnate the discussion. It's like watching the failures of direct democracy being melodramatically played out in a nerd forum.''


 * Yep.

''However, I did find it interesting that the German Wikipedia managed to settle this issue somewhat with a big public vote. Perhaps something similar could be arranged here? It should be painfully obvious by now that no amount of dialog between the concerned parties will ever yield anything more than both sides claiming that their position is the consensus position. This will most likely continue to cause nothing more than page after page of unproductive argument. I would think that at this point it would be far better to just put the thing to rest for some predetermined period (say, a year or two) with a big vote.''


 * Votes are never a good idea, because they polarize the issue, don't fairly represent the whole of the community (just the subset that happened to be online that day and aware of the vote), and prevent people from considering other's viewpoints and changing their minds. I was going to put the whole thing up for mediation, but didn't get around to it before leaving.


 * I wrote up my opinion here so that I didn't have to keep repeating it everywhere, and so people can refer to it during debates in my absence if so inclined.

''Anyway, take care and stay sane. :)''


 * I've been doing much better lately. :) — Omegatron (talk) 22:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Matt you might be interested to know that the German WP vote resulted in IEC prefixes not being used (deprecated) and the terms KB, MB, GB always being used in the binary sense for data sizes and decimal for data rates . If you want that to happen here then of course I agree with you. :) Fnagaton 01:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Karl Süss contact aligner.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Karl Süss contact aligner.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ishihara plate rg.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ishihara plate rg.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Uberpenguin-mail.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uberpenguin-mail.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Oakland-Section map.png


The file File:Oakland-Section map.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mips32 addi.png


The file File:Mips32 addi.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:I486dx2-tight.png


The file File:I486dx2-tight.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)