User talk:Matt Parlow

Re: protection of Perun
I think there is no need to get it protected, there haven't been too many edits to it recently. The last edit before you was 16th of July, protection is meant for articles in the middle of edit wars, which is not happening on this page right now. Instead you should try to reach an agreement on the article on the talk page (which is actually what protection is used for - to stop edit wars until discussions are concluded). I will have a closer look at the nature of your dispute to see if I can help out. --Konstable 04:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Block
Congratulations, you've won yourself a week-long block! Adam Bishop 17:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * What is civil or uncivil - is a matter of personal preferences. Definitely, telling someone being an asshole is not civil at all and is not vlaid justification for this block. Also, finding some reasons for block post mortem - is not civil at all! Removing forgeries and inaccuracies from the article text is a serious contribution to the quality of the article and shall not be reverted under any circumstances. I really do not feel comfortabe commiting anything serious to this article having in mind that an administrator could revert it with no good reason!--Matt Parlow 13:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

As per Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Adam Bishop for the following reason (see our blocking policy): being an asshole

Your IP address is ...

Legal action before the US court pending!

 * OK - the choice is yours!--Matt Parlow 13:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * IP evidence using CheckUser verifies that this account is very likely a sockpuppet of Velebit. Dmcdevit·t 15:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)