User talk:Mattagresti

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Outreach red bank, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Outreach red bank appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Outreach red bank has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Outreach red bank and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Outreach red bank with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Outreach red bank.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't contest a copyright violation such as this. Posting copyrighted material is a violation of copyright law and may lead to the loss of your edit privileges.  Trying to help.  Thanks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

If the content really is yours, please contact the e-mail address above. However, you should be made aware that there may be some notability issues; there are certainly some issues with the tone. It's an advertisement for the group, not an encyclopedia article. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I was about to delete this article but I think there's a possibility that you might be trying to use the correct process to validate the copyright status (if you agree, leaving a note here that says that you're doing that would be appreciated). However, as User:PMDrive1061 notes, there are other problems with the article that leave its fate in doubt.  Specifically, it seems to violate our WP:SPAM policy, and there are also no reliable sources that assert or confirm the notability of the organization in a verifiable way.  I urge you to address these issues fairly urgently.  Accounting4Taste: talk 23:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)