User talk:Mattatyahu35

February 2023
Hello, I'm Ppt91. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Värska, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 01:56, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Please pause and fix
I see that you are adding largely the same format of information to a variety of county pages, but there are several issues with what you are adding. It would be good if you would pause these additions while you work with other editors on how best to present this information. The issues as I see them: &#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The ref named "Fuller" is not defined. This causes an error on each page that you copy to.
 * The external links to ARDA should instead be refs. See what I did at Geauga County, Ohio to fix that.
 * Each time you add this you're putting an entire paragraph of explanation about "None" responses that isn't at all specific to that particular county. I think at the very least it should be relegated to a Notes section at the bottom of the page, but preferably just leave it out. It honestly comes off as an attempt to slant the data to imply that people are more religious than the source is reporting. It's also just way too much detail about a single percentage and again too generalized to be very relevant to the individual county.


 * to add: the reference to The ARDA that you're adding doesn't support the material that you're adding. The numbers just aren't there -- at the very least, you're summarizing specific religions from the report into more general categories. I've been wondering if you can provide more direct sources -- otherwise, I think the material should be removed. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:57, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)