User talk:Mattcruise

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Mattcruise: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Introduction
 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How do you edit a page?
 * How do you revert to a previous version of a page?
 * What about copyrights?
 * Community Portal

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes ( ~ ). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I saw your recent edits to Next but it took me a few minutes to work out what exactly you'd done and why, in the two edits. Although it's not required, if you could put summaries to edits, it really helps to just clarify what's changed, along with a brief reason. Obviously, if the reason is important, it can go in the talk page of the article. — metaprimer (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Revert
Sorry, but I had to revert your addition to David Miscavige. Under the rules for biographies of living people WP:BLP, all text not backed up with WP:RS reliable sources should be removed immediately (rather than just tagged). There was no cite that she was going to sue, and the coroner's report was a web page copy of a Usenet post. The rules can be annoying at times, but Scientology and critics alike have abide by them. And it means that the articles (usually) have pretty solid facts. You might try looking through books like A Piece of Blue Sky to see if there is anything in there. AndroidCat (talk) 03:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scoreless in the first


The article Scoreless in the first has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable; requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)