User talk:Mattdaviesfsic

 Leave a message Send an Email

If you want to tell me I'm wrong about one of my edits (or worse), you may wish to familiarise yourself with the key policies and guidelines listed here. If something I did is definitely not grounded in policy, let me know in case I was editing in my sleep.

''' Note that this page is manually archived very frequently - if you posted a message here and were expecting a reply, please check the latest archive in the box on the right. Thanks. '''

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Station editing - Passeneger volume and article improvements
Hi Matt Merry Christmas just wondering if along with the passenger volume tables additions we should include the main origin or destination station for the 2022/23 period from the ORR estimates of station usage for each station.

Best wishes, James JamesVilla44 (talk) 21:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, can I ask what you mean by that? I'm not sure I could ascertain that information from the ORR data if I understand you correctly. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/usage/estimates-of-station-usage
 * It shows the Number of journeys to or from main origin destination for each station in the far right column JamesVilla44 (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link, I hadn't seen that. Unfortunately I can't get it to work for the stations I select (it might just be me, though! )
 * I won't opt to use it personally, but if you wanted to add it in when I add (sometimes re-add) the tables, if you can get it to work, you'd be more than welcome. Saying that, it would ideally be in prose above the table, as they are getting rather large now!
 * Merry Christmas to yourself as well. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, re. some of the removals of these paragraphs, I've reverted two but only the ones where the table has been deleted. I would encourage you, when adding these paragraphs to add the table as well (unfortunately I can't get round the whole country that quick, so your help is very much appreciated!). Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * What do we do about Maurice Oly removing them though? Do you think they’ll just find our edit summaries sufficient and not attempt an edit war? JamesVilla44 (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Probably, I don't think he would care so much as to battle it out...! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * So your preferred order is
 * Platforms
 * Passenger volume
 * Services
 * ? JamesVilla44 (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, although not always will a "platforms" section be necessary (e.g., Altnabreac railway station). Services should always be last in any case with the service box there, but - IMO - with the exception of "Cultural references"/"Future proposals". Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * See User:Mattdaviesfsic/Station editing Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you think the information in section ===Access for disabled passengers=== in Gravelly Hill, Erdington, Chester Road and Wylde Greeen is a good addition and well sourced? JamesVilla44 (talk) 11:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I've demonstrated a possibility at Erdington railway station of one possibility, which is what I would probably do. Use National Rail (and the station map, which is at the bottom of the page - e.g., for Erdington to include other facilities in its own section.
 * I could probably add similar information like that in the articles I've been working on in the Highlands as well, to be fair! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Amakuru, an admin is now getting involved, that might be tough to deal with. Some of the ones like Kidsgrove might be fine though. I do think you’re eventually going to have to discuss the merit of your station edits on a talk page. And Maurice is indeed starting an edit war (See: Congleton, Macclesfield, Stockport) JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Amakuru has only reverted one, which is kind of a relief. However, his WP:NOTSTATS point is very fair - by that, policy says that tables of stats should have explanatory data, like at Kinbrace railway station. Hence that's not much of an issue, and I've finally worked out how to get that data on the website. Hopefully I can update most of them over the next few days.
 * I see you've posted on Maurice's talk page, I'm already watching his page so I can contribute if needed. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * And Maurice has removed the tables from Kidsgrove and Chester Road.
 * Looks like you’ve got a job to do on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways then, best of luck. JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi James, re. the "Platforms" sections, I only tend to add these for stations with 4+ platforms, so for stations like Erdington railway station, I'd probably agree with Maurice that it probably isn't too necessary (unless it's very brief in the service section). Of course, it would need to be cited as well, but I'm not sure of a site that would support that information either tbh. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Actually, the Network Rail Sectional Appendices could help here. E.g., this document, on page 922, verifies the platform numbers at Inverness...
 * I note this information is only readily available for the larger stations, as I say, but it is certainly reliable, no doubt about it... Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your close at Talk:Waka Kotahi
Kia ora, just wanting to check in to question your close of this move request. In your close, you admit that WP:TOOSOON applies but seem to have ignored it. Several of the users in support of the move have also echoed sentiments about how the new government has directed that agencies need to be at the English name and that we should follow suit, which doesn't seem like an argument that should hold any sway in move requests on wikipedia. Between those (and the equal number of users in favour and opposed), I'm curious as to how you can reach the view that a move is the appropriate outcome. Turnagra (talk) 08:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Having looked at it again, I may have misunderstood the premise of the move. I've reverted my closure so someone else can take another look at it. Apologies for the mistake. 👍 Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries, appreciate the reversion! Have a good night (or whatever it is in your timezone!) Turnagra (talk) 09:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your comment "Not necessary" a edit revert in "Gambino crime family"
Thank you for your feedback regard my edit, however I disagree with your statement "Not necessary". You have not elaborated why its unnecessary, which I believe doesn't follow Wikipedia etiquette and denotes you are acting in bad faith.

Let me explain why dollars after the numeric representation is redundant.

Please read this this statement in your mind: "$100 dollars" Once you read it, it should be "one hundred dollars dollars" This is redundant.

Instead, it should be: "$100" Once you read it, it should be "one hundred dollars"

The phenomenon where I am referring to is where redundant information is omitted for the sake of brevity and clarity, is related to the principles of conciseness and economy of language in writing. It's a component of good writing style and falls under the broader umbrella of effective communication.

Refer to the Wikipedia article "Concision" to further understand linguistics, brevity and clarity in the English language:

"In common usage and linguistics, concision (also called conciseness, succinctness, brevity, or laconicism) is a communication principle of eliminating redundancy, such as using as few words as possible in a sentence while preserving its meaning. More generally, it is achieved through the omission of parts that impart information that was already given, that is obvious or that is irrelevant."

Therefore, I ask you to consider my point. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gambino_crime_family&action=history Gameking69 (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Apologies, . I misread it as that you were trying to add the dollars, rather than remove it. I've reverted the edit now. Thanks for letting me know, and sorry about that once again! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Mattdaviesfsic. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! – bradv  04:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please remember the advice given at User talk:Mattdaviesfsic/Archive 6. Moving old articles to draft space, where they will get auto-deleted in 180 days, amounts to an out-of-process deletion. If you have any questions about this, please ask. – bradv  04:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

bare url template
Please don't add this template to the pages with no bare reference, bc you're wasting time of others. Egeymi (talk) 09:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Ship of Theseus&#32; on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Mattdaviesfsic! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:


 * 1) Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
 * 2) Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
 * 3) Paste  underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
 * 4) Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)