User talk:Mattftom

May 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Leadership approval opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election has been reverted. Your edit here to Leadership approval opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/benatipsosmori/status/1263823665365475330, https://twitter.com/benatipsosmori/status/1263824806836830208/photo/1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an image file on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable image. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Redfield & Wilton Strategies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redfield & Wilton Strategies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Redfield & Wilton Strategies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Dewritech (talk)  16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Redfield & Wilton Strategies (September 21)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Redfield_%26_Wilton_Strategies Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: BEFORE check shows there are insufficient sources to to meet NCORP. May be appropriate for mention somewhere in a list article on electoral poling companies, but not for a standalone. Contents of article are verifiable only according to primary sources.

— MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)