User talk:Mattgcn

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

bibliomaniac15 22:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Futuristic Sex Robotz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Betaeleven 04:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Aaron Ackerson}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 04:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:LoganAndVanilla.jpeg
Thanks for uploading  Image:LoganAndVanilla.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nchaimov 04:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Polysics

 * Polysics not be geek rock, dawg. :P --Chiaro 19:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Lemon Demon
I logged on to my wikipedia account for the first in a long time. I read what you told me about fake bands and shit, and I got a lot of crap from Olliver Kirby also. Apperently, you didn't google news his name. It was rumored that Lemon Demon "stole" riffs from Olliver and Rory that they put in public domain that they didn't really care about it at all and doubted if that was theirs to start. I was modifing the article and I was trying to say ""Neil cannot play bass or guitar, though, and when Lemon Demon perform live his close friend and neighbor Alora Lanzillotta plays the bass guitar. The band doesn't have a drummer, It though has been rumored that the original beats were taken from public domain by Olliver Kirby and Rory Bauers." I honestly, honestly, honestly did not write anything about them being friends or bandmates, it must of been whoever wrote the article afterwords. I live in Hoboken Nj, and Olliver and Rory are big guys around here so they were doing interveiws and they talked about Lemon Demon using their guitar riffs from eariler "rejected" stuff that they made. I got a email from Rory Bauers saying "''I really dont give a shit, im in jersey city and theys in kingston. how can you fuck up that bad? how cud we even meet?''" I AT NO POINT SAID THEY WERE BAND MATES. this isn't a case of "vandilism" it was a case of somebody took what I said... fucked it up... then another person pointed the blame at me. the guy after me deleted his account 3 months ago! along with his account was all of his contirbutions to wikipedia, so you look at the changes from my changes to most recent it skips the deleted account and linked me with his contributions. It doesn't show what I did compaired to another person, it shows what happend inbetween to two people's contributions. that is why it shows me for the edits. Nobody, not even me, noticed this change until nine days and exactly nine edits later. This is in no way, trying to give people credit who don't deserve it. As a standing member of the Good Article Members and with a perfect wikipedia record. I would never intentivly put in false information into an article. I assure you Olliver Kirby and Rory Bauers are as innocent bystanders looking at this and thinking "WTF?" as I am sure all of you are doing right now. This has been a Complete missunderstanding and not completly my fault. Though I do take some blame for starting the confussion. Someone must have thought Rory plays drums used in Lemon Demon = Rory plays in a Lemon Demon song = Rory is in Lemon Demon. Even though they doubt that it might be theirs. They think that Neil got the riffs off of Napster (or something like that) and didn't give credit where credit is due.

Wikimindless 02:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Thoughts
What do you think?

--Chiaro 21:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Andrew Kepple
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Andrew Kepple. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Andrew Kepple (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Damn Skippy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damn Skippy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Damn Skippy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)