User talk:Matthew.dimasi.offical

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Star Line Australia (October 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blue Star Line Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blue Star Line Australia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Blue_Star_Line_Australia Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CASSIOPEIA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Blue_Star_Line_Australia reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Titanic II
Hello, I'm Blue Riband. Thank you for your recent update to Titanic II. We've had some good-faith edits recently that all involve publicity but no real concrete progress on the actual building of the ship itself. To understand why these changes get reverted it might help to read the comments of other editors at Talk:Titanic II.

At Wikipedia we are an encyclopedia and not a publicity forum. We're expected provide reliable secondary sources to support any changes to an article. Why "secondary" sources? Today it's easy for anybody to announce anything. "Reliable sources" employ fact checking and editorial oversight. In the case of Titanic II these reliable sources would be major news organizations and/or industry publications.

The editorial consensus also left the project status blank because it has not changed much since 2014. We cannot say that the ship is "under construction" until steel is cut. At the moment there has yet to be any report that a building contract has been signed with any shipyard. Such an event would have considerable publicity. If you have any questions contact me on my talk page or you can add your own comments at Talk:Titanic II. Blue Riband► 15:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Deltamarin and Titanic II
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Titanic II, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Somehow your edit to "Project status" caused the bottom half of the infobox to be lost. I've blanked the status per the editorial consensus to leave it at that stage until there is a signed ship yard contract. It's been "in development" for almost six years! Your citation to Deltamarin's site was moved to the end of the introduction as it gives stronger support that the project has indeed been resumed. Blue Riband► 14:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)