User talk:MatthewHaywood/Archive 1

Aviation WikiProject Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Sarina State High School
Did you read the article before you slapped the advert tag on it?

I think it is actually a quite derogitory nasty piece of work. Garrie 03:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 13:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Société Dyn'Aero, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Fordan (talk) 23:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Elliot Joseph Prior
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 08:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Elliot Prior
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Elliot Prior, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Elliot Prior is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Elliot Prior, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Elliot Prior
Hello, what would you like to discuss? I nominated the page for speed deletion as the non-existent move/redirect appeared to me as a test page. You may also want to discuss this matter with the deleting admin or the CSDWarnBot in the article log mentioned above. – Zedla (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I apologize if you were upset by the warning messages. I can see how a 'test page' warning might be construed as an accusation of vandalism.  But your good faith move effort would not constitute vandalism when viewed against WP:VANDAL.  You may want to take a look at the speedy deletion criteria at WP:CSD which will explain what a G2:Test Page nomination is about.  Ultimately the article was noticed for redirecting to a non-existent article by the bot and was deleted by an admin per "R1:redirects to non-existent link" (also at WP:CSD).  – Zedla (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Tricresyl phosphate
Hi there. I removed everything about TCP and airplanes from the TCP article. I know that you contributed to this section so, I apologize if my action offends. These kinds of claims require serious references (books, refereed journals), not blogs and websites. A pretty substantial literature exists on the hazards of TCP. If you can be patient, which could tax your will power, you can be assured that others will add some good references about the risks that concern you. There are plenty of technically minded editors roaming around that do this kind of thing. Cheers and best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notes. And sorry to question your patience.  It is tricky trying to communicate in this way and not come across as surly, etc.  Now to my partonizing mode: experience on the Wiki-chem articles shows that people concerned about toxic chemicals tend to be pretty insistent. Unfortunately, these same editors often weaken the very cause they are passionate about because they get impatient (they just "know" there's a problem and sometimes convinced that a conspiracy is afoot), etc.  So the chemistry editors, who dont really have an angle to push one way or the other, they just like good sources, are often targeted by outraged defenders of what they "know" to be a "dirty secret." A fairly sure-fire approach to publicizing a particular chemical hazard is to cite a few great sources (not web-stuff) and to keep the wording sober.  End of patronizing speech!  In any case, I am going to leave the TCP thing alone for the moment, but it is likely that other editors will scrutinize the sources and ask for edits and better sources.  Nice talking to you, and happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

L98
Good plan batman, go for it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teta (talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Clouds4Pilots
A tag has been placed on Clouds4Pilots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 09:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to improve yourself!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  05:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rustler Yachts


A tag has been placed on Rustler Yachts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. When you recently edited Bowman 45, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cutter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bowman 42


A tag has been placed on Bowman 42, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WarlordFrederick (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rustler Yachts


A tag has been placed on Rustler Yachts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Spartaz Humbug! 17:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bowman Yachts


A tag has been placed on Bowman Yachts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Aircraft
Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 23:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Titanic II and Replica Titanic
Hello, I didn't go through the Titanic II page history enough to realise that you put the bulk of the work into forming the article. However I'm afraid that by your nominating Replica Titanic for deletion you yourself opened up the proverbial "can of worms". I'll grant you that the Palmer proposal has a public web site and the design progress is there to be seen. However we don't know how far the Gous project advanced before it was abandoned. Until Palmer actually starts construction and a ship begins to take shape his project remains no different from the earlier Replica Titanics that never materialized into steel. Stephen Payne, who has some experience designing ocean liners, says that the timeline from drawing a line to represent the length of a ship to delivery is approximately four years. So unless something undergoes sea trials by 2015 it isn't going to happen. NightSt✷r  talk  22:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jeremy Rogers Limited logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy Rogers Limited logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Titanic II Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Titanic II Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Titanic II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jurassic Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Forces on sails
I invite you to look at the discussion at Talk:Forces on sails and elsewhere in the Talk page, which I have just tied to the WikiProject Sailing. There are two parallel efforts, one in the main article and one in the sandbox. It appears that the two editors are unlikely to reach a consensus as to which approach is more appropriate to WP:MOS. It would help, if other editors would look at both efforts and comment at the Reorganization? section. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 00:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Titanic II
Please see my message at Talk:Titanic_II. There is an ongoing edit war from new users and ISPs who make changes that the ship is under construction but don't provide any citations. My previous request for page protection was denied. You might be able to help. Blue  Riband►   18:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3D model of Titanic II.png
 Thanks for uploading File:3D model of Titanic II.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bavaria Yachtbau Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bavaria Yachtbau Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 23:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

File:2018 Golden Globe Race route.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

TITANIIC AfD
Hello, you might want to look at an AfD discussion here: Articles_for_deletion/TITANIIC. This is another project that is all bluster and no substance much like the SS Titan Foundation some years back. However you put a lot of work into the Clive Palmer Titanic II article but it would not surprise me if that were to go up for AfD as well. The comments that I see on the TITANIIC deletion discussion indicate that some editors feel that widespread coverage is not enough to outweigh WP:CRYSTAL. While I thought Palmer was serious about building the ship it looks like it has been all but officially abandoned. We have no RS of any work being done since Deltamarin finished what they were paid to do through 2014. Blue Riband► 23:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Clive Palmer's latest announcement
Hello, I've left a message on Talk:Titanic II regarding Palmer's latest announcement on the project. Blue Riband► 12:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)