User talk:MatthewJ144

Sawley, North Yorkshire
It looks like the text you have written for Grade II listed Sawley Hall confuses this Hall with the village (community) hall - are they the same ? If not, perhaps it might be better to drop-down the village hall to a separate para under a Village hall bold header. Acabashi (talk)


 * You are correct, these are two separate buildings. Thank you. MatthewJ144 (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You could still add Sawley Hall under a separate header and flesh it out a bit. There's a nice ref about the shoot (Botham) at the Hall, which can be doubled-up here. If you do add the shoot text in, I can add the doubled-up link so you know how it's done - you might know this already. I've added a find sources temp to the talk page which might help you find stuff. There is more about cricket at Sawley here.
 * Acabashi (talk)


 * Thanks for the source temp and cricket reference, good piece. Hopefully will now be able to find some more information! MatthewJ144 (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You might find useful scraps in these - I'm not sure they are all your specific Sawley, but some of it might pad out the Sawley Hall bit - it seems some of the denizens were JPs and members of the Bronte society - all good stuff to make an article interesting. Acabashi (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/domesday/dblock/GB-424000-465000/page/3


 * http://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/gbr/england/northyorkshire/3209_sawleyhallwestandeastgroves/


 * http://www.goldonian.org/photos/photo_archive_homes/pages/sawley_hall.htm


 * http://www.parksandgardens.org/places-and-people/site/6840


 * http://www.barnardos.org.uk/who_we_are/history/barnardos_homes/barnardos_homes_yorkshire/barnardos_homes_yorks_sawley.htm


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oh4NAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=bioi9ZhUjn&sig=EI20Yz531cwH57-zbjNZ4OcHYmo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RAhjUeHhIMSJPbGUgYgE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22%20-wikipedia&f=false


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eEwvAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA608&lpg=PA608&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=EgMxMjqcNH&sig=mM6p9t1cAi1VmlzasDvVEKZ0cq4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0AhjUaT4MYS3POD1gHg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22%20-wikipedia&f=false


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=41USAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA85&lpg=PA85&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=sylz3L7QkL&sig=ZG9tF5Brq3_Jxiy6WzUBWrpJqG0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0AhjUaT4MYS3POD1gHg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22%20-wikipedia&f=false


 * http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/21140/pages/2613/page.pdf


 * http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/YKS/WRY/Ripon/Ripon68.html


 * http://www.burnleyexpress.net/news/new-sawley-hall-unveiled-1-1669541


 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=r6siAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oa8FAAAAIBAJ&pg=2815,5256465&dq=sawley-hall&hl=en


 * http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70810F7395F13738DDDA00994D9405B838DF1D3


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YVgyAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA574&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vwpjUercOcnaPNingPgJ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22&f=false


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oh4NAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA228&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vwpjUercOcnaPNingPgJ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22&f=false


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=g8AHAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA1-PA123&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XQtjUd_yC8aeO9rVgLgK&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22&f=false


 * http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ckcQAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA395&dq=%22Sawley+Hall%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vgtjUda2Eo6xPJiWgKgG&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Sawley%20Hall%22&f=false

Books
You can use Amazon to get publishers, publish dates, and ISBNs - this for the Trueman book: here - which is better than a link to Google books.

I'd be careful about adding as a cite a link to the promotional home pages of companies and services you write about, such as the pub. Editors will remove them as advertising. The pub cricket stuff is very good though. Acabashi (talk)


 * Thanks, citation has now been updated and removed the potential advertising. Felt it was really unnecessary on review. MatthewJ144 (talk) 21:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)