User talk:MatthewJ2008

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strone (Inverness) has been accepted
 Strone (Inverness), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Strone_(Inverness) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Redrose64. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, LNER Class K4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello. I did notice that my addition to the LNER Class K4, adding the maximum speed to the main table, had been removed. I decided to undo the edit as I did not know why. In the the third line to the bottom of the prototype section, it mentions the maximum speed. All I was doing was taking information already on the article, and making it easier to find and more accessible. When I was researching this locomotive, I had trouble finding the maximum speed as I expected it to be in the table. I found it in the article and decided it would be helpful for future viewers to avoid the issue I had. If there is any issue with this please let me know. I won't re-add the edit, but will keep my confusion as to why it was removed, so please do let me know why it was taken off. Thank you MatthewJ2008 (talk) 10:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The sentence beginning The K4 could now demonstrate is entirly unsourced, it was added more than 15 years ago in, but I don't know where got the 60 mph claim from, because no references were added at all.
 * In the UK, steam locomotives were not rated for maximum speed. Whilst diesel and electric locomotives have been for a long time (perhaps always), this is primarily because of the possibility of electrical or mechanical damage to the motors, bearings and other components at high speed; in the cab there is typically a small sign saying "MAX SPEED 90 MPH" or similar. Steam locomotives have no such warning; moreover, the possibility of damage due to high speed running is very much lower. This is not to say that damage did not occur: a "hot axlebox", for instance, was a fairly common occurrence but this was mainly due to inadequate lubrication rather than exceeding a particular speed. The speed that a steam loco might be capable of is mainly governed by the rate at which the boiler can generate steam, but this isn't a safety limit that must not be exceeded - it is a physical characteristic which is difficult to surpass.
 * Furthermore, very few British steam locomotives were fitted with speed indicators - judging the train's speed where a restriction did occur, such as at tight curves like Morpeth or Salisbury, was very much left to the driver's experience; and if the driver's judgement let him down, accidents could occur (see Shrewsbury rail accident and 1906 Salisbury rail crash). That said, the K4s did have speed indicators (of the Flaman type, driven from the rear coupled axle) fitted in 1937-38, but these were provided to ensure that the numerous speed restrictions applying to various parts of the West Highland Line were not exceeded. The locomotives themselves had no restriction. The speed indicators were removed during the 1939-45 war and not refitted afterwards, so cannot have been considered essential.
 * In the age of steam, speed restrictions were primarily governed by the characteristics of the route (curves, junctions) and track (unevenness due to engineering or subsidence). The speed of trains might be further restricted by the proportion of coaches or wagons equipped with the continuous brake - a train with no brakes other than on the loco and the guard's van might be restricted to 25 mph even though the loco itself could be capable of much more. The speed of the train would be set by the timetable planners taking such characteristics into account, and the working timetable (WTT) would give times not just at calling points but at passing points - stations not stopped at, junctions, signal boxes etc. The driver was expected to follow the WTT using his watch as a guide; if he controlled his train such that he passed these points at the times laid down in the WTT, it was unlikely that the train would have exceeded speed limits. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for the clarification. Greatly appreciated MatthewJ2008 (talk) 14:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malkopsvlei (December 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malkopsvlei and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Malkopsvlei Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blaze_Wolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Malkopsvlei reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:00d83160d63be45ca401ad7e3afa42d3.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:00d83160d63be45ca401ad7e3afa42d3.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Malkopsvlei
Hello, MatthewJ2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malkopsvlei, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Malkopsvlei


Hello, MatthewJ2008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Malkopsvlei".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Web Revival (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Web Revival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Web_Revival Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Web_Revival reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 12:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Web Revival (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zingarese were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Web Revival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Web_Revival Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zingarese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Web_Revival reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zingarese talk  ·  contribs  (please  mention me on reply&#59; thanks!) 15:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I strongly disagree. In fact in my personal (and in all fairness perhaps not entirely educated) opinion, I would argue the Gizmodo is the least reliable for the subject at hand, and specifically the fact it's a human movement, not a literal fact. Thus it's the speaking of the people who are directly involved in the movement that mater, not some source (which is in fact tertiary) simply giving it's take on it. It's not some small village which has a location, and population, and places and things, which need factual, reliable sources. However I will try my best to find more credited citations. MatthewJ2008 (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)