User talk:MatthewMastracci

'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:MatthewMastracci&action=edit&section=new Please click here to leave me a new message. ]'''

File source problem with File:OSX Terminal sh Prompt.png
Thank you for uploading File:OSX Terminal sh Prompt.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bubble Babble


The article Bubble Babble has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of meeting the general notability guideline, nor of the existence of any reliable sources. Nothing about this seems to exist in Google books, Google news, nor Google scholar, and the only things about it on the web itself seem to be blogs, other wikis, self-published sources, and Wikipedia mirrors, none of which are usable as sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SU-Toolbar-Firefox.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SU-Toolbar-Firefox.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nice article
I see that we have similar Youtube viewing habits. Back in early February, I thought about writing about Mary, but there wasn't quite enough information available yet (I wasn't even sure how to spell her name!) so I figured it would just have to wait until I had more time to research. And yesterday, when I went to start doing more searching...I found that you'd already written a very nice start-class article. Thanks for doing that. I plan to do some further research, and might try to contact Alex to get some copies of hard documents (and possibly a list of collections that include her works), but I wanted to take the time to express my appreciation for your work. I hope you'll write more often! All the best, Risker (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)